Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,490 of 41,683    |
|    Peter Larsen to ChrisCoaster    |
|    Re: Volume Level of "Tuner" vs that of "    |
|    12 Jun 11 06:49:04    |
      25a3b78b       From: digilyd@hotmail.com              ChrisCoaster wrote:              > It's the same wherever I go. In the car, I switch from my mp3 jack or       > CD to a FM station and instinctively I have to turn the volume down by       > at least 1/3rd.              Not to worry, the FM stations will get new equipment real soon and address       that so that they can come closer to an aspect ratio of zero or less.              > At home, switching from a record, CD or tape to the radio - gotta       > crank that volume down! Ditto at the beach on my boombox.              At home perhaps you can try get away with installing an attenuator in the 4       to 6 dB range inside the contraption, but I wouldn't even consider trying       with a car radio, those likely have their innards compressed to a negative       aspect ratio and you will not bee able to make them fit the case if you open       it.              > Because I really don't believe that radio stations' own processing is       > solely to blame for my having to crank UP the volume when going from       > AM/FM > a CD or mp3 or cranking DOWN the volume after switchng from       > CD/ mp3/phono > AM/FM.              Very many years ago some design contained sensitivity trimmers to make the       phono input match FM, my Beomaster 3000 was like that, including       balance-matching via nulling of inversed channel              > 1. Does the tuner section on consumer stereo equipment/portables/auto       > sound incorporate some compression/limiting circuitry?              If so it is called "night" or similar. We can not have the populace       understandin this, so we call it something else.              > 2. Is the       > tuner input level set intentionally louder than the line inputs(CD,       > aux/mp3, etc)? 3. Or, is it a combination of 1 and 2, on top of       > compression/other processing employed by the radio stations?              FM statios are voiding the headroom asumption for clean transmission that       the tuner electronic designer made because it was in his textbook. He should       have desined for 5 dB transmission malpractice. Orban is not to blame, he       quite probably warn them in the manual. From the sound of some of the louder       FM's over here they first max the 5 band, then hit a multiband clipper and       then push it well into the tranmitters protection limiter. All have       hideously audbible compression artifacts that stand out obnoxiously on even       the poorest possible playback equipment but can become impressively loud on       a JCV loudenboomer hung on a warehouse wall with volume set to 11 and       beyond. And thus the FM stations aim is well and truly met, because THAT is       what they aim for.              > much appreeesh,              I must have some kind of mind damage from working with printing machines for       so many years, I tend to solve the problem by turning the car radio off and       just listening to the car. Perhaps I should resume my venture into       avant-garde techno ... a computer harddrive died during a file-shuffle with       all my music on it back in 1997, and I just haven't bothered to retrace ...       was in a large rythmical structure being built to support ephemerial synths       when it happened. I made a "In C" rendition in DeLuxe music on my Amiga, I       had it as midi dump, but now only the DAT tape of the Amiga sound systems       performance of it remains ....              > -ChrisCoaster :)               Kind regards               Peter Larsen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca