Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,542 of 41,683    |
|    Jamie to RichD    |
|    Re: earbuds    |
|    13 Aug 11 11:33:05    |
      21be4db0       XPost: sci.electronics.design, alt.audio.equipment       From: jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net              RichD wrote:       > I have the standard earpod set, which came with my       > armband MP3 player. It pops out every 2 minutes.       > How did these things become the standard design?       > They suck.       >       > So now i'm looking for the earbud style, i.e. inside the       > ear. They range from $8 to $40, and Shure offers a set,       > over $100?!? For something so small, how can there       > be such a range? Is there really such quality difference?       >       > They are all sealed in blister packs, there's no chance       > to compare. Even if there were, differences in       > environment, time of day, etc. swamp perceptual       > discernment.       >       > How would you go about testing these things, in the lab?       >       > --       > Rich       Epoxy works well.               Jamie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca