Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,545 of 41,683    |
|    Les Cargill to RichD    |
|    Re: earbuds    |
|    13 Aug 11 18:44:41    |
      21be4db0       XPost: sci.electronics.design, alt.audio.equipment       From: lcargill99@comcast.com              RichD wrote:       > I have the standard earpod set, which came with my       > armband MP3 player. It pops out every 2 minutes.       > How did these things become the standard design?              Kids these days...              > They suck.       >              Yep. The cheap ones tend to sound bad, too.              > So now i'm looking for the earbud style, i.e. inside the       > ear. They range from $8 to $40, and Shure offers a set,       > over $100?!?              They have sets over $400.              > For something so small, how can there       > be such a range?              It's a micro machined (or cast or molded) thing.       It's a transducer.              > Is there really such quality difference?       >                     Yeah, there apparently is. They are, as you note, a total       pig in a poke.              I would tend to resort to brand name choice, mainly Shure,       because Shure get used as in-ears by people who perform with       them for a living. We're down to what amounts to folklore,       since you can't try them on.              > They are all sealed in blister packs, there's no chance       > to compare. Even if there were, differences in       > environment, time of day, etc. swamp perceptual       > discernment.       >       > How would you go about testing these things, in the lab?       >       > --       > Rich              I am not Shure :) I'd estimate my ear canal geometry, use       a model of that to connect them to a measurement mic or       a standalone, Panasonic omni electret element, and run       an impulse ( and maybe white noise and maybe swept sine       tones ) through 'em. That's got to be fraught with       error - my tympani is not much like the back of an       electret element.              What would be interesting ( and might even be worth $20       or so ) would be a subscription service where people do       empirical reviews of these items. Problem is: how do       you establish credibility? Do people even care? If I       were considering such a purchase, and I could hedge 10:1       a purchase error, I'd probably do it.              I don't see one, so I figure there's a good reason       for the lack of them.              --       Les Cargill              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca