Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,577 of 41,683    |
|    Dick Pierce to ChrisCoaster    |
|    Re: Just twisted my ankle over a BOSS He    |
|    04 Oct 11 09:15:26    |
      1c645963       From: dpierce@cartchunk.org              ChrisCoaster wrote:       > That does not explain their flat frequency response. Go on google       > image and keyword rh-300 and frequency response and you'll see what I       > mean! only a tiny trough around 7k but otherwise ruler flat.              Flat frequency response? Methinks someone may need their eyes       checked.              With the amount of enthusiasm heaped on this headphone in this       thread, my curiosity was piqued so I went and looked at the       frequency response graphs. Replotting that same data on a more       normal vertical scale (not the compressed 80 dB scale shown)       reveals that, in fact, not only is the reponse not "flat",       it's also on the mediocre side of normal for headphones. And       that "tiny trough around 7k?" Well, on the graph you reference,       that tiny trough (which is actually at about 5600 Hz), is some       19 dB below the level at 1 kHz.              Overall, the 20-20kHz response envelope is a very UNimpressive       +-15 dB. Even over a more restrictive range like 100-10kHz,       it's still +-12 dB.              Ho hum.              --       +--------------------------------+       + Dick Pierce |       + Professional Audio Development |       +--------------------------------+              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca