home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.tech      Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in      41,683 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 40,607 of 41,683   
   Don Pearce to ckozicki@snet.net   
   Re: Question: Is "128" Totally Irrelevan   
   01 Nov 11 19:41:33   
   
   9efd5e53   
   From: spam@spam.com   
      
   On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:31:25 -0700 (PDT), ChrisCoaster   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Oct 31, 10:53 am, ChrisCoaster  wrote:   
   >> Seriously!   
   >>   
   >> Aside from 1/2hour episodes of "The Shadow" or "Great Gildersleeve"   
   >> radio shows, is the greatest thing to happen in the 1990s totally   
   >> passe?   
   >>   
   >> My personal mp3 download minimum is 192kbps.  For rips - 256 if it's   
   >> poppy stuff, 320 for jazz, classical, and stuff I just can't live   
   >> without.  :)   
   >>   
   >> -ChrisCoaster   
   >________________   
   >Come on folks - this isn't a post about lacy lingerie or cleavage!   
   >   
   >Seriously, I'm still finding a lot of "128"s on the web(mp3s encoded   
   >at 128kbps).  Shouldn't such a low bitrate be outlawed?   
   >   
   >-CC   
      
   Try encoding with AAC at 128kbits/sec and prepare to be pleasantly   
   surprised. MP3 is SO last millennium.   
      
   d   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca