35427c27   
   From: spam@spam.com   
      
   On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:02:37 -0700 (PDT), ChrisCoaster   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Nov 1, 3:41 pm, s...@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:31:25 -0700 (PDT), ChrisCoaster   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>  wrote:   
   >> >On Oct 31, 10:53 am, ChrisCoaster  wrote:   
   >> >> Seriously!   
   >>   
   >> >> Aside from 1/2hour episodes of "The Shadow" or "Great Gildersleeve"   
   >> >> radio shows, is the greatest thing to happen in the 1990s totally   
   >> >> passe?   
   >>   
   >> >> My personal mp3 download minimum is 192kbps.  For rips - 256 if it's   
   >> >> poppy stuff, 320 for jazz, classical, and stuff I just can't live   
   >> >> without.  :)   
   >>   
   >> >> -ChrisCoaster   
   >> >________________   
   >> >Come on folks - this isn't a post about lacy lingerie or cleavage!   
   >>   
   >> >Seriously, I'm still finding a lot of "128"s on the web(mp3s encoded   
   >> >at 128kbps).  Shouldn't such a low bitrate be outlawed?   
   >>   
   >> >-CC   
   >>   
   >> Try encoding with AAC at 128kbits/sec and prepare to be pleasantly   
   >> surprised. MP3 is SO last millennium.   
   >>   
   >> d- Hide quoted text -   
   >>   
   >> - Show quoted text -   
   >_____________   
   >Will iPods and other mp3 players be able to play them?   
   >   
   >   
   iPods will. As for MP3 players - it depends.   
      
   d   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)