Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 40,631 of 41,683    |
|    Peter Larsen to ChrisCoaster    |
|    Re: Question: Is "128" Totally Irrelevan    |
|    10 Nov 11 16:22:38    |
      e07068ca       From: digilyd@hotmail.com              ChrisCoaster wrote:              > I still see 128s out there and can really hear the difference between       > one of a song and a 192bit of that same song. I have a harder time       > hearing the diference going from 192 to 256kb and up though as i've       > lost me top!       > :)              it is about clarity, bass tightness even, listen for the canvas, the small       details in the room, that said I'll re-iterate that acceptable - defined as       better than compact casette - starts at 192 kbit/s, in that we fully agree.              > -CC               Kind regards               Peter Larsen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca