From: l0k1@thedarkdesign.free.fr.INVALID
Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:21:50 +0000, Don Pearce did cat :
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:02:37 -0700 (PDT), ChrisCoaster
> wrote:
>
>>On Nov 1, 3:41 pm, s...@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:31:25 -0700 (PDT), ChrisCoaster
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> >On Oct 31, 10:53 am, ChrisCoaster wrote:
>>> >> Seriously!
>>>
>>> >> Aside from 1/2hour episodes of "The Shadow" or "Great Gildersleeve"
>>> >> radio shows, is the greatest thing to happen in the 1990s totally
>>> >> passe?
>>>
>>> >> My personal mp3 download minimum is 192kbps. For rips - 256 if it's
>>> >> poppy stuff, 320 for jazz, classical, and stuff I just can't live
>>> >> without. :)
>>>
>>> >> -ChrisCoaster
>>> >________________
>>> >Come on folks - this isn't a post about lacy lingerie or cleavage!
>>>
>>> >Seriously, I'm still finding a lot of "128"s on the web(mp3s encoded
>>> >at 128kbps). Shouldn't such a low bitrate be outlawed?
>>>
>>> >-CC
>>>
>>> Try encoding with AAC at 128kbits/sec and prepare to be pleasantly
>>> surprised. MP3 is SO last millennium.
>>>
>>> d- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>_____________
>>Will iPods and other mp3 players be able to play them?
>>
>>
> iPods will. As for MP3 players - it depends.
and the same question proved to be a problem for Vorbis/ogg, a
sad story sometimes is the Story of audio ;-(
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
