XPost: uk.tech.broadcast, uk.tech.digital-tv, uk.rec.audio   
   XPost: sci.electronics.repair   
   From: G6JPG@soft255.demon.co.uk   
      
   In message <5258b5bb27dave@davenoise.co.uk>, "Dave Plowman (News)"   
    writes:   
   >In article ,   
   >   Jerry  wrote:   
   >> Later Plowman had to admit that it is the hardware and *not the   
   >> circuit design* that causes the problem, if the US used ring   
   >> circuits with the same hardware the self same problems with   
   >> regards to electrical fires would exists just the same.   
   >   
   > 'The same hardware' as used for radial circuits is not suitable for final   
   >ring circuits. As I keep saying, you need to learn some fundamentals   
   >instead of making a fool of yourself.   
   >   
   As an outsider viewing this argument with interest (albeit one who grew   
   up in Germany, with _properly designed and specified_ non-ring circuits,   
   so find them odd), I'm curious what the word "final" means here, as it   
   seems to be being deliberately left in in a way that suggests it _is_   
   significant.   
   --   
   J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf   
      
   It was kind of Wagnerian in that it was totally for blokes, but it didn't have   
   difficult woodwind passages. Stuart Maconie (on "Tommy") in Radio Times, 14-20   
   November 2009.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)