Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41,070 of 41,683    |
|    Peter Larsen to Dick Pierce    |
|    Re: Transmission line nonsense, was Re:     |
|    05 Oct 12 08:35:59    |
      From: digilyd@hotmail.com              Dick Pierce wrote:              > And to talks about something that's shorter than a wavelength       > as a transmission line itself is bordering on absurd. Consider       > the fact that at those frequencies, you're actually looking at       > the system as a Helmholtz resonator with a whopping large       > acoustic inertance, a tinu effective acoustic cimpliance, and       > a pretty high absorbtion loss, and then calculate what happens       > to the effective pahse shift as you move through that overdamped       > resonance.              So what you say is that a "transmission line speaker" is a bass reflex box       with a very small box volume and a very large port volume?               Kind regards               Peter Larsen              > Bud Fried (of, among other things, IMF fame) did more to set back       > the amateur's grasp of physical acoustics then damned near anyone       > else: he, regretfuylly, was a very persuasive, charming personality       > who was otherwise clueless about acoustics.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca