Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tech    |    Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in    |    41,683 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41,148 of 41,683    |
|    Dick Pierce to thekmanrocks@gmail.com    |
|    Re: cost effective acoustic foam????    |
|    16 May 13 20:51:43    |
      From: dpierce@cartchunk.org              thekmanrocks@gmail.com wrote:       > no mess: "Probably only an issue if he attacks it with a blow        > torch, after installing on the outside of his house."       >       > My priorities regarding soundproofing foam:       >       > #1. Flame retardent/resistant.       >       > #2. Sound absorbtion.       >       > Remember the Station!       >       > 'nuff said.              What do you mean by "soundproofing? Do you mean preventing sound       from getting in or out of an enclosed space (or, as it sometimes       referred to, reducing sound transmission)? If so, foam is pretty       terrible at that, especially at low frequencies.              --       +--------------------------------+       + Dick Pierce |       + Professional Audio Development |       +--------------------------------+              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca