home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.tech      Theoretical, factual, and DIY topics in      41,683 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 41,148 of 41,683   
   Dick Pierce to thekmanrocks@gmail.com   
   Re: cost effective acoustic foam????   
   16 May 13 20:51:43   
   
   From: dpierce@cartchunk.org   
      
   thekmanrocks@gmail.com wrote:   
   > no mess:  "Probably only an issue if he attacks it with a blow   
    > torch, after installing on the outside of his house."   
   >   
   > My priorities regarding soundproofing foam:   
   >   
   > #1.  Flame retardent/resistant.   
   >   
   > #2.  Sound absorbtion.   
   >   
   > Remember the Station!   
   >   
   > 'nuff said.   
      
   What do you mean by "soundproofing? Do you mean preventing sound   
   from getting in or out of an enclosed space (or, as it sometimes   
   referred to, reducing sound transmission)? If so, foam is pretty   
   terrible at that, especially at low frequencies.   
      
   --   
   +--------------------------------+   
   +         Dick Pierce            |   
   + Professional Audio Development |   
   +--------------------------------+   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca