From: shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com   
      
   Once upon a time on usenet Trevor wrote:   
   > On 31/05/2017 2:25 PM, ~misfit~ wrote:   
   >> Once upon a time on usenet Julian Macassey wrote:   
   >>> On Tue, 30 May 2017 06:04:33 -0700 (PDT), hundleynigel@aol.com   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>> On Monday, 28 May 2001 01:49:21 UTC+1, Gary Wolanski  wrote:   
   >>>>> Hello   
   >>>>> Can anyone give me some info on an NAD 7080 receiver, I picked it   
   >>>>> up at a garage sale the other day, (well just barely a lot of   
   >>>>> transformer there) and plan to drive my two 15" subs. It works   
   >>>>> fine after some fixing but I would like to know the wattage   
   >>>>> output of each channel I am guessing at 100 +, does anyone have a   
   >>>>> spec. sheet?.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> A great piece of kit Gary, Motorola output transistors and a hearty   
   >>>> good transformer ensures that this tuner amp gives sonically   a   
   >>>> great performance even by some of today's amps. A well made and   
   >>>> thin on the ground now NAD Classic.   
   >>>   
   >>> Poor Gary has waited sixteen years for an answer and yet his main   
   >>> question has not been answered.   
   >>   
   >> It's getting to the stage where more than 50% of posts are being   
   >> made by 'necromancers'. Sad. :-/   
   >   
   > We don't know the OP's are now dead surely? :-)   
      
   LOL. I was reffering to dead threads or posts, not authors.   
      
   > More likely it's just that GG users are brain dead.   
      
   Well there is that. ;)   
   --   
   Shaun.   
      
   "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy   
   little classification in the DSM*."   
   David Melville (in r.a.s.f1)   
   (*Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)