81.bb.dnainternet.fi> 4282b4da   
   XPost: rec.audio.opinion, alt.religion.scientology   
   From: jennconductsREMOVETHIS@mac.com   
      
   In article <4c76d51a.153638770@news.eternal-september.org>,   
    spam@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:47:42 +0100, Eeyore   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >Soundhaspriority ( the real one ? )wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> Even worse, we shouldn't have a system where people with defective genes   
   > >> (the homos) are reproducing using these defective genes by artificial   
   > >> means,   
   > >> or otherwise.   
   > >   
   > >I know there's a 'redhead gene' but one for homosexuality ? How about   
   > >bisexuals too ? False argument methinks.   
   > >   
   > >Graham   
   >   
   > A gene for homosexuality would disappear from the pool pretty quickly,   
   > one would imagine. A bit like a gene for infertility.   
   >   
   > d   
      
   That might be true if gay people never parented children.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)