81.bb.dnainternet.fi> 9c2b4379   
   XPost: rec.audio.opinion, alt.religion.scientology   
   From: jennconductsREMOVETHIS@mac.com   
      
   In article ,   
    flipper  wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:26:35 -0700, Jenn   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >In article <9htd76lulep5ob2l6fibsbgjout0d2271l@4ax.com>,   
   > > flipper  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:41:47 -0700, Jenn   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> >In article <4c76d51a.153638770@news.eternal-september.org>,   
   > >> > spam@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote:   
   > >> >   
   > >> >> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:47:42 +0100, Eeyore   
   > >> >>  wrote:   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> >Soundhaspriority ( the real one ? )wrote:   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> Even worse, we shouldn't have a system where people with defective   
   > >> >> >> genes   
   > >> >> >> (the homos) are reproducing using these defective genes by   
   > >> >> >> artificial   
   > >> >> >> means,   
   > >> >> >> or otherwise.   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >> >I know there's a 'redhead gene' but one for homosexuality ? How about   
   > >> >> >bisexuals too ? False argument methinks.   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >> >Graham   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> A gene for homosexuality would disappear from the pool pretty quickly,   
   > >> >> one would imagine. A bit like a gene for infertility.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> d   
   > >> >   
   > >> >That might be true if gay people never parented children.   
   > >>   
   > >> Not really because it could be recessive.   
   > >   
   > >True.   
   >   
   > There's also experimental evidence to suggest it's environmental or,   
   > if genetic, environmentally triggered as you can alter the incidence   
   > in rats by manipulating population density.   
   >   
   > Humans are, of course, more complex but that would indicate it,   
   > assuming genetic, could propagate 'the common way', absent   
   > environmental triggers, even if dominate.   
   >   
   > That also suggests if population density is a consistent trigger it   
   > could be a 'natural' population control mechanism. Or not. No one   
   > really knows.   
      
   >   
   > The oxymoron "gay marriage" is an altogether different issue, though.   
      
   As opposed to the moronic (without the oxy) legal argument against it.   
   -)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)