8f9231db   
   XPost: rec.audio.opinion, alt.religion.scientology   
   From: spam@spam.com   
      
   On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:07:09 -0700 (PDT), "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to   
   Reason!"  wrote:   
      
   >> >What about that whole random thing?   
   >>   
   >> That's part of it. As long as you have two populations, one of which   
   >> breeds better than the other, the worse will eventually die out. I   
   >> think we can agree that homosexuals have a poorer breeding record than   
   >> heteros. This observation alone should be enough to convince that   
   >> homosexuality isn't an inherited trait.   
   >   
   >I disagree. As long as there's discrimination there's a reason to hide   
   >one's orientation. Look at all the "conservative republicans" who have   
   >been outed, yet have families. Ditti those in the military. And those   
   >are just two examples.   
   >   
   >In a vacuum your argument might even work. It doesn't in real life   
   >though.   
      
   I have no idea how your response addresses my post. I am talking about   
   genetics; no more and no less. Whether - and even how - anybody is   
   "outed" has absolutely no bearing on the matter.   
      
   d   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)