home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.tubes      Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11      52,877 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 51,082 of 52,877   
   Jenn to flipper   
   Re: Gay Marriage: Who Cares?   
   09 Sep 10 08:03:03   
   
   l-september.org> 6f891779   
   XPost: rec.audio.opinion, alt.religion.scientology   
   From: jennconductsREMOVETHIS@mac.com   
      
   In article ,   
    flipper  wrote:   
      
   > On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:22:57 -0700, Jenn   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >In article ,   
   > > flipper  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:56:48 -0700, Jenn   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> >In article <8sj886hlho8bbpm5pcp8gtj5ej8h22lemj@4ax.com>,   
   > >> > flipper  wrote:   
   > >> >   
   > >> >> On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 18:05:46 -0700 (PDT), Jenn    
   > >> >> wrote:   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> >On Sep 5, 10:28 am, flipper  wrote:   
   > >> >> >> On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:42:23 -0700, Jenn   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >>  wrote:   
   > >> >> >> >In article ,   
   > >> >> >> > flipper  wrote:   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> >> Actually, it's you who's never discussed one thing about the   
   > >> >> >> >> "effect... on real people's lives."   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> >I would be happy to do so if you are interested.   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> Only if you first provide a dictionary so we know what words are   
   > >> >> >> being   
   > >> >> >> redefined on the fly.   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >> >In those states and countries where same-sex marriage was once   
   > >> >> >outlawed but now is legal, the definition of legal marriage has, as it   
   > >> >> >has before, changed.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Chatty Cathy pull ring falsehood.   
   > >> >   
   > >> >My statement is absolutely true.   
   > >>   
   > >> I've proved it false multiple times   
   > >   
   > >Far from it.   
   >   
   > I didn't say you were capable of comprehending it.   
   >   
   > Just for chuckles, when the Court said, in Loving v Virginia, that   
   > "Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to   
   > our very existence and survival.... " just what do you think the word   
   > "marriage" meant and how was it different from the Racial Integrity   
   > Act ban of it when mixed race? And if the definition is 'different'   
   > then what bearing does the Court's assessment of "marriage" have on   
   > the 'other thing' the Racial Integrity Act prohibited?   
   >   
   > The answer is that no definitions 'changed', not to mention everything   
   > else I've explained such as decisions having no meaning unless one   
   > knows that the bloody hell definition of the words are.   
      
   Definition of marriage before Loving:  a civil union that can be   
   restricted according to race.   
   Definition after Loving:  a civil union that cannot be restricted   
   according to race.   
   >   
   > Puuuuuull ring.   
   >   
   > >> but there's little reason to   
   > >> bother doing it again as a Chatty Cathy doll can't 'hear'; it simply   
   > >> repeats the same recording when one pulls the ring and that's neither   
   > >> 'discussion' nor 'debate'.   
   > >>   
   > >> >> And corporations are 'persons'.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> > That's all the dictionary that is needed.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> You've proved that it isn't.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> >Now, do you wish to discuss?   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> There's no point to a 'discussion' with a Chatty Cathy doll.   
   > >> >   
   > >> >You're very good at calling names, but you are very poor at basic   
   > >> >reasoning.  You've been backed into a corner, and you don't know how to   
   > >> >quit while you're behind.  Have a nice life...   
   > >>   
   > >> That's amusing coming from someone who began the Chatty Cathy   
   > >> impersonation by summarily declaring anyone who disagreed with your   
   > >> pull ring recording a 'moron'.   
   > >   
   > >False accusation.  Please show where I've done that.   
   >   
   > Inability to recall previous sound emanations is the natural result of   
   > a Chatty Cathy doll having no writable memory storage.   
      
   Obviously, you can't back up your accusations.  "Big surprise".   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca