home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.tubes      Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11      52,877 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 51,102 of 52,877   
   Ian Bell to Patrick Turner   
   Re: 12AX7 grid current   
   16 Sep 10 21:58:37   
   
   b3e5f0fc   
   From: ruffrecords@yahoo.com   
      
   Patrick Turner wrote:   
   > On Sep 16, 5:34 am, Ian Bell  wrote:   
   >> I am having a strange problem with what appears to be distortion due to   
   grid current in a 12AX7.   
   >> It's a CC stage with a 3K Rk bypassed about 120K in the plate and a 300V   
   supply. Anode sits at just   
   >> over 200V and cathode just below 2V.   
   >>   
   >> I would not expect to see any distortion due to grid current with an input   
   signal of 250mV rms at   
   >> 2KHz but I do. There's a 1Meg from grid to ground and the test oscillator   
   is fed to the grid via a   
   >> 100K resistor. Analyzer  is connected across grid to gnd. Tube off, there   
   is no distortion with the   
   >> 100K in cct or shorted. Tube powered up I get about -33dB 2H measured at   
   the grid, -39dB 3H, -59dB 4H.   
   >>   
   >> Short the 100K and the 2H drops to to below -70dB.   
   >>   
   >> I tried changing the tube but the result is the same. What is going on?   
   >>   
   >> Cheers   
   >>   
   >> Ian   
   >   
   > In some old AM radio designs where the first audio tube was a high   
   > gain triode like a 12AX7 the method of biasing was often grid leak   
   > bias with a 10M Rg and no Rk was used. There is a slight current flow   
   > along the 10M giving a bias of about -1V and this bias current is   
   > about proportional to Ia so the more Ia, the more -bias and so the   
   > triode then self biases OK.   
   > The distortion generated was ignored and was much less than from other   
   > causes in most old radios.   
   >   
   > The onset of grid current in a 12AX7 is gradual with the actual bias   
   > voltage value, and Ig begins at some Eg1 well below 0V, and not only   
   > when Eg1 goes positive with respect to Ek.   
   >   
   > 12AX7 are rather a beancounter's favourite tube because you get a load   
   > of gain. But maybe you'll find that the finite input resistance which   
   > you are discovering exists also appears with other triodes. The fact   
   > the distortion dissapears when you short out the series 100k is   
   > because your source impedance from sig gene falls to maybe600 ohms and   
   > the grid input resistance is virtually completely shunted, and the Ia   
   > is then controlled without the non linear grid input resistance   
   > interfering.   
   >   
      
   Yes, I have come across the same effect in my work with mu followers. I was   
   just surprised to see it   
   acting so soon. generally you can allow the signal to take the grid up to -1V   
   before worrying about   
   grid current bu that seems not to bee the case with the 12AX7 - today I fed it   
   with a mere 25mV and   
   it produced 1% distortion. There's something funny going on here.   
      
   > To get the best with 12AX7 performance one should always try to get Ea   
   > rather high for a given amount of Ia which should be more than 0.6mA,   
   > so that a decent negative bias voltage to the grid is needed.   
      
   Looking at the curves that is going to be quite hard. To get -2V bias at 200V   
   then Ia needs to be   
   way below 0.6mA.   
      
   Whatever   
   > is driving the grid of the 'AX7 should have low source resisance.   
      
   That is n ot an option in this case as it will be a 100K volume control so   
   even if that is fed from   
   zero ohms the worst case source R would be 25K.   
      
   Now   
   > have you tried biasing the 'AX7 grid with say 47k? This is a typical   
   > value for a phono amp, and could also be good for the input of a power   
   > amp although you'll commonly see 470k used for power amps and line   
   > stages.   
      
   I am using 1Meg at present - ah maybe that's what is causing the trouble - I   
   made it that big so as   
   not to disturb the NFB that will be added later - the 100K would be the input   
   arm of the NFB - I'll   
   try smaller grid R and see if that helps - good idea - thanks Patrick.   
      
     If you have a source select switch or a switched volume   
   > control in the grid circuit of some preamp or power amp input tubes   
   > you can sometimes hear a click each time the source is changed or the   
   > volume is adjusted and its the altering level of grid Vdc. It only   
   > takes a jerk of a few mV to make a click sound. To avoid such   
   > nonsense, one might use say 100k grid bias R with say 0.22uF input   
   > blocking cap with source select and volume control in front of the cap   
   > and not able to very slightly adjust whatever slight Vdc may exist at   
   > the grid. And if you want lowest possible noise generated by the grid   
   > biasing resistance you need to keep the R value low as possible but   
   > without being too low a load for the driving stage. If this is a CD   
   > player with Rout less than 600 ohms you could have Rg = 10k and maybe   
   > no need for any dc blocker cap.   
   >   
      
   It is a phones amp - bootstrapped 12AX7 CC feeding a pair of 12BH7 arranged as   
   White follower. rIght   
   now the White produces less distortion than the 12AX7.   
      
      
   > As tubes age, the grid can act strangely and its slight tendency to be   
   > always slightly more negative than the bias supply, or say 1V ess than   
   > 0V where Rg = 10M, becomes less of a tendency, and the bias control   
   > becomes lost and grid slowly becomes positive and Ia then is turned on   
   > more so that older tubes can have a positive grid with very low Ea and   
   > high Ia as a result. This happens in old radios and nobody notices   
   > until Ea has declined to about +20V only, and distortion is beginning   
   > to get audible at a percent or more.   
   >   
      
   Don't think that is a problem as I am using new tubes right now.   
      
   > Your 12AX7 operating conditions seem about just right, and I guess   
   > changing samples of 12AX7 should not change the phenomena you see -   
   > although some well worn 'AX7 samples will probably measure more THD   
   > than newer ones with a harder vacuum.   
   >   
      
   As I said both ones I tried are new - both by EH.   
      
   > Things could be worse - if you used a small BJT with bypassed emitter   
   > resistance - the THD will be horrendous, but with a much bigger   
   > difference between having a 100k in series with source and base and   
   > having no series R.   
   >   
      
   LOL   
      
      
   Cheers   
      
   Ian   
   > Patrick Turner.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca