Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 51,112 of 52,877    |
|    Ian Bell to Ian Iveson    |
|    Re: 12AX7 grid current    |
|    22 Sep 10 10:27:41    |
      From: ruffrecords@yahoo.com              Ian Iveson wrote:       > Ian Bell wrote:       >       >>>> Indeed, one of the really big questions is just how load       >>>> does the client want the phones to be - that and the       >>>> sensitivity of the phones makes a big difference to the       >>>> output requirements. As a rule, 100mW into almost any       >>>> headphone will blow your ears off and at least 10mW is       >>>> needed to give a decent level even in the most sensitive       >>>> phones. That's a 10dB difference in power that       >>>> translates       >>>> in to a voltage range of about 3 to 1.       >>>>       >>>> For this client the worst case is probably his 100R       >>>> phones       >>>> that will take 3V rms. That means with the 12:1 tap the       >>>> primary must supply 102V pp into 14K or so.       >>>> Alternatively       >>>> with the 6:1 tap we need 51V pp into 3600R for about       >>>> 90mW       >>>> in the phones. The 541V pp is less of a problem than the       >>>> 3600R load.       >>>>       >>>> His other phones are 34R types. For 90mW these need       >>>> 1.75V       >>>> on the secondary which at 12:1 is about 60V pp- again       >>>> not       >>>> too bad, this time into 4896R.       >>>       >>> Doesn't this argument omit the issue of efficiency, part       >>> of       >>> the matter of sensitivity that you originally       >>> acknowledged?       >>> If the higher impedance 'phones are proportionately more       >>> efficient, then you might be home and dry. Or not.       >>>       >>       >> Depends. I define sensitivity as dB(SPL) per mW of power       >> to the headphone - in other words, how much noise power       >> you get for unit electrical power. In that case,       >> efficiency is included.       >>       >>       >> It just so happens that both types of headphones produce       >> pretty much the same sound pressure per mW electrical       >> input and if anything the 34 ohm ones are slightly more       >> sensitive.       >       > OK, it's just that you didn't say they were equally       > sensitive, or efficient.       >       > In which case, OPTs with the correct ratios and optimised       > for the task should make both phones look equal to the amp,       > and the amp should look appropriately equal to both phones,       > no?       >       > Damping factor, power, voltage, current, etc. all come out       > in the wash don't they?       >       > Aren't Sowter's trannies the same price with windings of       > your own spec? They were with mine.       >       >>> Alternatively, it's reasonable to consider the old-school       >>> 100R to be for gentle music, and the 34R for rock. Tell       >>> him       >>> this is why god gave him two 'phones. My bet is he'll be       >>> more than satisfied with what you've already done.       >>>       >>       >> Not an option at present - he wants to listen to music of       >> any kind on either phones.       >       > Tell him he can't have everything, and your compromise is       > better than the alternatives.       >       >>> What, incidentally, if he blows his ears out? Aren't       >>> there       >>> some active safety guidelines for manufacturers? Could he       >>> sue?       >>>       >>       >> That had occurred to me but I suspect it is the old health       >> and safety thing where it is sufficient to say don't turn       >> the wick up too high - and surely a similar onus must be       >> on the phones manufacturer?       >       > Possibly, but there are EC guidelines on headphone outputs.       > Even if they are not statutory requirements, flouting them       > could count against you because it can be construed as       > reckless.       >       > I considered selling a head amp but meeting EC and CE       > requirements seemed daunting. I thought of limiting, simply       > by using zeners on the output or by using an expander in the       > gfb, but that can't be done practically without SS       > tarnishing the allure of classic design.       >              (fortunately) this client is in the US so CE does not apply but I think you       are right - |I'll ook       into it.              Cheers              ian       > Ian       >       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca