Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 51,139 of 52,877    |
|    Ian Bell to Ian Iveson    |
|    Re: SE Headphones Amp    |
|    02 Oct 10 13:09:13    |
      From: ruffrecords@yahoo.com              Ian Iveson wrote:       > flipper wrote:       >       >> If I understood his meaning he has the relative effect       >> backwards.       >>       >> For a given shunt inductance a lower load has better LF       >> response       >> (shunt less significant).       >       > This is the first time for many years that the meaning of       > the term "load" in this context has been challenged.       >       > Generally, I have avoided the issue and used the less-easily       > misunderstood term "load resistance" or just "resistance".       > Lately, there has been so little discussion by amateurs that       > the jargon of commercial operators, or "professionals" as       > they prefer to call themselves, has erected barriers against       > incursion. Now the self-styled professionals are getting       > sloppy.       >       > An open circuit represents zero load, right? So a high load       > resistance is a low load.              Moot. An open circuit implies 'no' load which could equally imply infinite       resistance.              Cheers              ian       >       > I'll try to use more accessible language in the future.       >       > Ian       >       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca