From: none@nospam.org   
      
   "flipper" wrote in message   
   news:6ju2e6tkj9vjqb4mdvcjqf9o77cn0tbuta@4ax.com...   
   > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 03:31:56 -0800 (PST), Patrick Turner   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Nov 14, 11:28 pm, flipper wrote:   
   >>> Well, RF is outside my realm but during various roamings I recall   
   >>> seeing a couple of things that might give you something to at least   
   >>> search for.   
   >>>   
   >>> The first is I seem to recall comments about "pre-distortion" used to   
   >>> compensate the Gilbert cell. Sorry that I can't recall more on that   
   >>> topic.   
   >>>   
   >>> The other is the Gilbert cell being very sensitive to component   
   >>> mismatch. That makes sense as we all know a 'diff amp' is and with   
   >>> the   
   >>> Gilbert being one feeding the emitters of two others one can only   
   >>> imagine the problem being worse, especially with discretes.   
   >>>   
   >>> Have you tried matching the transistors and some emitter   
   >>> degeneration?   
   >>   
   >>Yes indeed I tried adding in emitter resistors to the top 4 bjts and   
   >>this worsened all operation, and raised the carrier distortion at 1/2   
   >>max Vo to about 4%, and the signal looked like a class B amp with 3H   
   >>crossover THD, YUK.   
   >   
   > Emitter degeneration lowers gain, of course.   
   >   
   > Sorry, can't help much but I suspect it's discrete mismatch since I   
   > gather IC versions do better than you're seeing.   
   >   
   >   
   >>I could not get the circuit to give a clean reduction of envelope   
   >>shape to a straight line at the positive and negative maximum envelope   
   >>swings.   
   >>   
   >>Anyway, I understand the Gilbert cell now, but I won't be using it as   
   >>an alternative to the tube signal gene with AM.   
   >>   
   >>I then replaced the 6BX6 pentode with 6EJ7 in my SE AM modulator which   
   >>has a tuned RF transformer circuit for anode load.   
   >>The tuned anode coil is wrapped with a much smaller secondary coil   
   >>which is grounded one end and feeds aa 2k0 R divider load to vary the   
   >>output 0dB to -30dB in six switch positionslevel at the output   
   >>terminal. At -30dB Rout = 50 ohms and the low signal is strong enough   
   >>to drive all AM radios with say 5pF coupling to the antenna terminal.   
   >>   
   >>The 6EJ7 only very slightly reduced the envelope THD, but showed it   
   >>could produce an over modulated signal with less AF drive.   
   >>I also tried a 6EH7 which is the variable µ or "remote cut off"   
   >>version of the 6EJ7, but envelope THD was much worse.   
   >>   
   >>The SE pentode modulator was checked out for any faults in DC supplies   
   >>and basic condition, the first time in 13 years. No problems.   
   >>   
   >>The pentode is set up with B+ = 250V and Eg2 = 225V via 33k and 0.1uF   
   >>to 0V.   
   >>   
   >>The cathode has Rk = 1k8, and grid is biased with 1M to 0V. The RF   
   >>signal comes from a 12AT7 CF buffer after the 12AT7 Hartley oscillator   
   >>with a single tuned grid LC. When the RF ranges are is displayed on a   
   >>CRO, you cannot see any form of THD so I guess THD < 0.5%   
   >>Levels are about 7Vrms. Easy peasy for 1/2 f a 12AT7.   
   >>   
   >>The RF buffer driver has 0.02uF then 15k to pentode grid. Then I have   
   >>a 22k from pentode grid to a 0.1uF which couples to a 12AU7 CF which   
   >>buffers the audio input signal. The RF level before the modulator   
   >>remains fixed and determined by the oscillator level which does not   
   >>change much.   
   >>   
   >>So in effect, I have RF between 360kHz and 1.75MHz in two ranges and   
   >>simply mixed with an audio signal in a linear resistance network.   
   >>   
   >>But the pentode is set up to have no audio gain at its anode because   
   >>its load at AF is an RF coil of only 190uH, with tuning C max below   
   >>1,000pF.   
   >>At the the anode the LC is tuned to the same F as the oscillator   
   >>frequency, and the parallel LC has maybe 10k tuned impedance, so at RF   
   >>the pentode produces plenty of RF gain, but not excessive gain, and   
   >>the gain is slightly loaded by the secondary load of 2k0 resistance   
   >>divider load.   
   >>The LC RF transformer functions to keep any AF out of the anode output   
   >>but meanwhile, the high RF gain is possible because the Rk is bypassed   
   >>with 0.0033uF which has low enough Z at the range especially at high   
   >>RF, so that the slight roll off in RF level at HF is slightly   
   >>compensated.   
   >>   
   >>The 0.0033uF is a high Z at below 20kHz so that there is an audio   
   >>signal just below the grid input audio signal appearing at the   
   >>cathode. Thus the 6EJ7 functions as a CF at AF. The grid input signal   
   >>is thus generating a fairly linear change of voltage across the Rk and   
   >>therefore a fairly linear change of anode current. There is also a   
   >>change of AF anode current due to the Vk to Vg2 change but its   
   >>effect is minor, and can be neglected.   
   >>   
   >>The change of anode current at AF causes a corresponding change of   
   >>current in the tuned circuit and a fairly linear envelope shape. To   
   >>check the linearity, I measured more carefully before abandoning my   
   >>simple little modulator.   
   >>   
   >>This time I used my low THD signal < 0.01% from my 1kHz oscillator.   
   >>I could say that the 12AU7 buffer input to the modulator would   
   >>generate maybe 0.2% THD at the 7Vrms grid drive needed.   
   >>   
   >>I set the CRO to monitor the peaks of the un-modulated carrier at the   
   >>centre horizontal gratical. and adjusted the modulation and CRO level   
   >>so that the maximum peak RF voltage with full modulation was twice the   
   >>peak RF voltage with no modulation. The only problem I could see was   
   >>the slight inability of the modulation to reduce to zero on wave   
   >>trough minimums.   
   >>Considering the positive or top side of the modulated carrier wave, So   
   >>I could get a +ve envelope Vswing of 2.0 times the positive swing of   
   >>the unmodutaed carrier, while the negative swing side was 1.90 x   
   >>unmodulated carrier.   
   >>   
   >>The negative going envelope measured almost identical, and no worse.   
   >>From RDH, THD % = 100 x ( 0.5 [ 2.0 - 1.9 ] ) / ( 2.0 + 1.9 ) = 100   
   >>x (0.5 x 0.1) / 3.9 = 1.28%.   
   >>   
   >>The THD rapidly reduced away from the maximum modulation. The Dn at   
   >>1.3% can be seen as a slight flat on the peaks of either +ve or -ve   
   >>sine wave shapes.   
   >>   
   >>In a receiver with a simple diode + C + R detector of any kind, there   
   >>is a ripple voltage across the C, just like you get in a 1/2 wave PSU   
   >>rectifier. For the detector to function to filter the RF out and yet   
   >>allow the AF voltage to rise and fall linearly, the C must be just the   
   >>right value to give a time constant so that large high frequency AF   
   >>signals don't suffer slew distortion.   
   >>In my own detectors I use in most radios I use a CF buffer at the last   
   >>IF secondary and the cathode drives a germanium diode to charge a   
   >>220pF with 1M R which has 50Vdc idle voltage across it. This detector   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|