From: phil_a@tpg.com.au   
      
    "Iain Churchus Stinking Fuckwit "   
      
   >>   
   >>>> ** The busses don't stop where this dude lives....   
   >   
   >>> Flipper was perfectly correct when he stated   
   >>> that even during the early days of tape recording   
   >>> in WW2, the quality was better than disc   
   >>> transcription.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> ** WW2 was never in the discussion.   
   >>   
   >>   The early to late 50s were.   
   >   
   >   
   > True, but that does not alter the fact that even the   
   > earliest broadcast tape recorders (Magnetofon)   
   > running at 76cms were superior to disc transcriptions,   
      
   ** What arrogant bullshit.   
      
   An argument based on Hitler's speeches alone is utterly insane.   
      
      
   > just as Flipper stated.   
      
      
   ** He never did, you stinking liar.   
      
   When tape equipment is removed from the process of making LPs, as it was for   
   " digital"  recordings sold in the early 1970s by Denon and others and also   
   for all the " Direct to Disk " records  -  sound quality took a *very   
   dramatic* leap forward.   
      
   Such LPs became the standard for hi-fi demos and are a perfect demonstration   
   of how even the very much better tape recorders of the 1970s were still way   
   inferior to good old vinyl.   
      
   Transcription disks are even better ( ie lower noise)  than any vinyl   
   pressing made from them.   
      
   My god you are one  CLUELESS  TURD.   
      
      
      
      
   ....  Phil   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)