From: phil_a@tpg.com.au   
      
   "flipper the total fuckwit "   
   >   
   >>>>   
   >>>>When tape equipment is removed from the process of making LPs, as it was   
   >>>>for   
   >>>>" digital"  recordings sold in the early 1970s by Denon and others and   
   >>>>also   
   >>>>for all the " Direct to Disk " records  -  sound quality took a *very   
   >>>>dramatic* leap forward.   
   >>>   
   >>> A 70's LP master disc is not a 40's transcription disc,   
   >>   
   >>** So fucking what ?   
   >   
   > The 'so what' is you can't use one as a testament to the other because   
   > the simple fact is they are not the same thing.   
      
   ** There is no significant difference.   
      
   Acetate or vinyl coated on a metal plate and cut by a standard disk lathe   
   produces the same result as the very best LPs.   
      
      
   > By the mid 50s tape and LP had replaced the transcription disc   
      
   ** So fucking what ?   
      
   By 1970, vinyl LPs made without tape were the very best ever made available.   
      
   If tape were inherently superior to vinyl   
      
     -  this would  NOT  BE  POSSIBLE !!   
      
           FUCKHEAD  !!   
      
      
      
   >>> Frankly, this fuss about transcription discs is irrelevant to the   
   >>> topic of consumer Hi-Fi   
   >>   
   >>** You raised it  -  fuckhead.   
   >   
   > No, I 'raised' the story of Bing Crosby using tape for his radio   
   > broadcasts as a testament to it's fidelity.   
      
      
   ** But never proved that WAS the actual case by any means.   
      
    My god you are one  CLUELESS  FUCKING  TURD.   
      
      
      
   ....  Phil   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)