From: phil_a@tpg.com.au   
      
   "flipper the total fuckwit "   
   >>   
   >>>>> A 70's LP master disc is not a 40's transcription disc,   
   >>>>   
   >>>>** So fucking what ?   
   >>>   
   >>> The 'so what' is you can't use one as a testament to the other because   
   >>> the simple fact is they are not the same thing.   
   >>   
   >>** There is no significant difference.   
   >>   
   >>Acetate or vinyl coated on a metal plate and cut by a standard disk lathe   
   >>produces the same result as the very best LPs.   
   >   
   > They aren't the same lathes and cutters   
      
   ** They mostly are the just the same.   
      
   >and a 40's transcription disc is NOT an 'LP' nor is it an LP master.   
      
      
   **  But it is virtually the same and so has the same qualities.   
      
      
   >>> By the mid 50s tape and LP had replaced the transcription disc   
   >>   
   >>** So fucking what ?   
   >   
   > Why do you think they were GONE?   
      
      
   ** Tape is more convenient and cheaper to use.   
      
       Editing is simple, tape can be erased and re-used.   
      
       That's why Bing liked it.   
      
       You stupid fucking ass.   
      
      
   >   
   > Hate to burst your bubble   
      
      
   ** I would love to burst your pointy retarded head.   
      
      
      
   ....  Phil   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)