a6d83b7a   
   From: IainNG@kolumbus.fi   
      
   "Patrick Turner"  wrote in message   
   news:8cba1314-01fc-4b45-83c8-18fb2f1b2a40@o10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...   
      
   > Quad-II does more than 12W/channel, more like 22W, so   
   > comparable to the STA25, but 1/2 the price.   
      
   And Phil thought the Radford was cheap !!! LOL:-)   
      
   According to the spec I have before me (Hi Fi Year Book)   
   Quad II is quoted at 15W. Distortion 3rd harmonic and   
   higher is given as 0.1% at 12W   
      
   So if we are to compare apples with apples and use   
   0.1% as a standard as Radford did, then the Quad II   
   is a 12W amp.   
      
   >> Patrick. The STA100 was *never* intended, nor marketed   
   >> for home hi-fi. The STA15 and STA25 were designed for   
   >> domestic use.   
      
   >Sure, but read my lips... STA100 *could -have - been - used - for -   
   >domestic - audio.*   
      
   Just as an Aston Martin could be used for pizza delivery   
      
   Cheers   
   Iain   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)