Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 51,497 of 52,877    |
|    Alex Pogossov to All    |
|    AM detector, part 3    |
|    18 Jul 11 20:18:32    |
      From: apogosso@tpg.com.au              We have seen that:       1. Sensitivity determines the minimum carrier level which allows to handle       required modulation index. A pn diode has the best *potential* sensitivity.       (Only liquid nitrogen can improve it further. Sigh...) A tube is four times       worse.       2. For an unbiased detector modulation handling always reduces with audio       frequency, for the biased one -- it stays close to 100% till a certain       frequency, then starts to fall.       3. An unbiased detector HF high-level performance does not depend on the       signal level, whilst for the biased detector works worse and worse (slew       rate wise) with the carrier increasing. This it requires an efficient       (delayed and amplified AGC).              === How to properly bias the diode in an unbiased detector ====              Everyone knows that differential resistance of a pn diode is approximately       Rd = 25 Ohms / I,       where I - current trough the diode in mA.              What is the differential resistance of a diode with no bias, at low voltage       (<10mV)? Is it infinitely high? The answer is "No". A diode acts as a       resistor at low voltages. In fact, the above formula is not correct. More       correct version of it should be:              Rd = 25 Ohm / (Io + I), where       Io - so called saturation current or reverse current of the diode in mA;       I - current flowing through the diode in mA.              This equation is derived from I = Io * (exp (e*V / kT) - 1). Note that in       part 1 I deliberately omitted " -1" for simplicity.              For a silicon diode Io, the reverse current, is of the order of picoamps,       therefore, with no bias (I = 0) its resistance Rd is gigaohms, virtually       infinite.              For a germanium diode reverse current Io is in the range of 0.5...5uA. for       example, if Io = 1uA, then Rd = 25KOhm.              Now consider you use a germanium diode with Io=1uA in a conventional       booooring detector fed from a Hi-Z IFT with no cathode follower. For a low       signal the rectifier is virtually shunted by Rd which is as low as 25K in       this case. Needless to say that the low Rd=25K will be greatly shunting the       LC tank which normally has 100...300K of resonance impedance. The detector       will lose its sensitivity.              Reducing Io improves performance. You can try the following experiment. In a       booring radio replace a vacuum diode with a germanium point contact one.       Most likely sensitivity of the radio will drop. Now cool the diode by       spraying it with CO2 or some quickly evaporating liquid. The radio will come       to life. Warm the diode by a soldering iron -- the radio will become       completely dead.              Note that Io changes 2 times per 10 degrees, Rd changes reciprocally in the       same proportion.              Now it is easy to explaim why Partick ended up with 3 germanium diodes in       series. He connected them in series to increse Rd. Probably each of his       diodes had about 0.5uA of reverse current (Rd = 50K). Three diodes would       have 150K which is sort of OK. Connecting more diodes in series though       increases Rd, reduces the sensitivity as the RF voltage is divided between       the diodes. If one diode needs 25mV of RF to rectify, three diodes need       75mV, etc. So there somwhere lies the optimum number of the diodes in the       chain. Too few -- you shunt the LC tank and lose gain, too many -- you raise       the sensitivity threshold.              If Patrick happen to experiment on a cold winter day, perhaps we would have       heard about "two diodes". If Partick had chosen to fix his radio during a       scourching 45C heatwave, then today we would have heard his stories about       four Germanium diodes...              Mystery solved...              But what is the best Rd of a diode to use as a detector? To answer the       question consider the following.       Everyone knows that an equivalent load the detector presents to the IFT at       high signal is R/2. It is logical to presume that at low signal (<25mV) the       load on IFT shall also be R/2 -- so that IFT does not "see" a differenc in       load over the whole range and thus works with the least distortion and       losses.              In a common boooooring detector R is about 500K. Thus Rd shall be 250K,       which translates into 100nA of the diode reverse current. One germanium       diode has higher reverse current and therefore unsuitable. What about a       silicon diode with a negligible Io? The answer is obvious -- bias it so that       at no signal the current through the diode is 100nA. Or on the load it will       translate into 50mV of DC voltage drop.              That is the rule: bias a silicon diode to have 50mV across the load. (Use a       hi-Z multimeter for this purpose). The bias voltage must be temperature       compensated, so it must be taken from an auxiliary forward biased diode.              If you want to use a germanium diode, you need to reverse (!!!) bias it, so       that Io + I = 100nA. For example, if your Ge diode has 1uA of reverse       current, then you need reverse bias it so that --900nA is flowing, or --45mV       is on the load. Needless to say, it is impractical to do so given that Io       depends on temperature. So, do not use Ge diodes in Hi-Z detectors.              (With Io=1uA a Ge diode will be perfect in a detector with R=50K, not 500K.)              What to do if you are not looking forward to complications with forward       biasing Si diodes? Then... use Schottky diodes!!!! They have Io from 10nA to       500nA depending on the type. Buy a dozen of 1N5711 Schootky diodes and       select the ones with suitable Io. To measure Io use a multimeter in a mV       range in series with the diode under test and any battery, e.g., 9V battery.       Multimeters have either 1M or 10M input resistance. (To find this out       measure say a 9V battery with 1M in series with the DVM. It will either show       4.5V or 8.5V). Aim at lower than 100nA taking into account heating of the       chassis in operation.              What about properly biasing a tube detector. The above concept still       applies, but because of higher temperature, for a tube diode Rd is 4 times       greater. Rd = 100R / I.              So for a boooring detector with R=500K emission current at no signal should       be around 400nA, or 200mV across the load.       If your detector diode is decent, like 6AL5, you will probably have more.       For example, in my Lafayette HE-80 receiver I have about 390mV. The detector       is overbiased and is excessively loading the IFT. Therefore I need to       additionally reverse bias the circuit by connectin the load resistor not to       GND, but to some negative voltage. Even better to reduce the heater voltage       to have, without signal, about 200mVdc on the load .              If your vacuum diode is feeble as 6AV6 or 6Q7, etc. your emission current       might be not enough to deliver 200mV at 500K load. In this case you might       like to add slight positive bias to the circuit.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca