Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 51,603 of 52,877    |
|    John Smith to rrusston@hotmail.com    |
|    Re: Building a new shortwave tube radio    |
|    11 Nov 11 10:07:59    |
      464f11d0       XPost: rec.radio.shortwave       From: bit_bucket@gmx.com              On 11/10/2011 9:52 PM, rrusston@hotmail.com wrote:       > With the survivalist market as well as the DIYers who would build a       > kit I have given thought to the idea of building a new tube shortwave       > receiver as a usable, practical set.       >       > That means no regens, no DC bullshit, and no plug in coils. It must       > have production grade RF and IF coils, a bandswitch, and require       > alignment. If sold as a kit the builder will need a RF generator and a       > scope (or a spec an or CSM with a track gen).       >       > It should use off the shelf parts even if those shelves are bare, as       > it is better to copy an existing item than design from scratch. I       > would clone the Eddystone dial mechanism and the bandswitch and coils       > from some Hallicrafters or Hammarlund set, they could be sold as       > desperately needed replacement spares for the old sets too. I would       > use a seeing eye tube mounted in a hole in the dial as opposed to a       > meter movement, again, getting a run of new tubes made is possible if       > you are buying several thousand. There are some surplus that could be       > used if really needed too.       >       > I would use a separate power supply and speaker for several reasons.       >       > I would have the radio take in B+ and heater voltage and put out 600       > ohm +4 audio. A regular supply could be used at home or car battery       > and a switchmode brick for B+. A headphone jack would be supplied off       > this tube.       >       > The set should cover 500 kHz to 30 MHz, AM, SSB and CW, with a       > product detector of course. A 455 kHz IF is needed so as to use common       > mechanical or crystal filters, which are optional. There should also       > be a 455 kHz IF out for an external synchronous detector.       >       > Any other comments?              Yeah, why would anyone build a survival set whose filaments would burn       much more power than a VERY high end transistor set? You plan on       hauling around sq yards of solar cells to power that rig?              Regards,       JS              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca