Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 51,925 of 52,877    |
|    patrick-turner to Phil Allison    |
|    Re: SET amplifier Q    |
|    05 Nov 12 18:17:04    |
      From: info@turneraudio.com.au              On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 11:31:56 UTC+11, Phil Allison wrote:       > "John L Stewart" > > Phil has shown us that the harmonic content of the amp       he has for repair > varies quite a bit as the power level is changed. ** Duh       !! The percentage goes up with output level. You cannot stop paraphrasing a       false characterising -        can you ? > I would not depend on > curvature correction as a cure for amp       distortion. ** Pompous bullshit and a classic " straw man " fallacy. > The THD       may go down > but what about the higher order harmonics & IM? ** Converting a       lot of 2H into a small        amount of 3H can only be good. > It has been shown by many tests that these       are the objectionable > components in the reproduced > sound. ** Blah, blah,       blah.... Another fuckwit "straw man" fallacy. 10% 2H distortion ( as seen with       many SET amps)        represents a HUGE amount of IM with a complex wave - maybe as much as 50%.       Reduces music to purest mud. .... Phil              The very worst designs of SE amps generate 10% 2H at 1dB below clipping.        The best SET amps maybe make 4% at -1dB. This is without GNFB. Using adequate       GNFB of say 12dB and using average PO limited to < 1/10 of the clipping PO       means N&D are usually tolerable at least, and below limits of audible       perception by most ppl. But        when used with horn loaded speakers the SET performs with typical PO averaging       1/100 of clipping PO, ie, say 0.2Watts out of a possible 20W. Since Dn reduces       with Vo, it sounds OK.               In many past long tortuous arguments here and especially at aus.hi-fi there       were those who could never grant any SET amp hi-fi status, and they labelled       SET amps as illitimate, ie, bastard audio products. The loudest and most       stubborn accusers of SET        amps tended to have incomes derived from selling solid state gear, and they       were never ever to agree the purchase of an SET amp was sensible in any way -       bad for business. But despite the flames the SET amp buyers have kept on       buying SE amps. They        refused to accept they ever needed more than a few watts of triode power.              I have heard fabulous music from SET amps when used wisely and sensibly. But       There is no point comparing one lone 300B making 8 piddly watts to say a 100W       SS amp when both are tried at very loud levels with speakers rated for       88dB/W/M. Horses for courses.               Patrick Turner.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca