Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 52,082 of 52,877    |
|    patrick-turner to All    |
|    Re: Questions for Pat Turner    |
|    01 Jul 13 02:54:04    |
      From: info@turneraudio.com.au              I said..... > My reply is :- What has this got to do with the idea of stacked       Quad ESL57        > for hi-fi?               Mr Allison replied with ....              ** It's the mad ohms load thing again !!!!!!               No amplifier Quad ever made would "drive" a 1ohm load - or a 2 ohm for        that matter.               But it does not matter.               Yes, but many people gat all mixed up and cornfeused because they lack any       skills to think about grey. Black is fine, so is white, but grey? No way.       They need to be spoon fed with care. Quad ESL57 do present an amp with Z < 2       ohms at HF, but then Z > 32 ohms at LF, and Z "average" is between say 32 and       2 ohns and dependant on frequency, In fact, the load value average between 1       mili sec and the next        changes depending on the hundreds of harmonics in the music and how they       combine to cause a much varying load between one small time period and the       next.               If one uses a 1 ohm series R between speaker and an amp with Rout = 0.01 ohm,       then the source resistance driving the speaker = 1 ohm.              This is about the same as for Quad-II. If the amp is set for 2Vrms into ESL57,       then power at LF where Z = 32 ohms = 0.125 Watts. At 18kHz, the Z = 2 ohms       approx, and Vo has become 1.33Vrms and Po = 0.88 Watts. The Quad-II works OK.       But what does this tell anyone about power and speaker sensitivity?       In the above sampe case, perhaps it takes 0.125W to produce LF SPL = 70dB, (       just guessing ). The same SPL at 18kHz requires 0.88W, ie, 7.1 times the LF       power. Luckily, the amount of HF power needed for most music between say 7kHz       and 20kHz is far less        than for LF, so for those puzzled by what doesn't matter, maybe there's the       answer. Many ppl just don't get it though, and never ever will.               Speakers with low Z at LF present a much worse problem for amps than ESL57,       which are in fact "easy to drive". Maybe old AR9 were real horrors. They had a       pair of 3.4 ohm 11" bass woofers in parallel. These had world's lowest       sensitivity and required        high power to gety good bass, and very low amp Rout becaise at 120Hz they were       less than 2 ohms. I found connection of woofers in series and with totally       revised X-over, you could get Z to be less likely to fry amplifiers.              Patrick Turner.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca