Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 52,091 of 52,877    |
|    patrick-turner to All    |
|    Re: Questions for Pat Turner    |
|    06 Jul 13 02:43:44    |
      From: info@turneraudio.com.au              Phil mentioned....              > ** The AR9 was first sold in 1978 and used two 12 inch woofers, same ones        > used in the AR11 released in 1977.        ** AR constantly refer to the above woofers as being 12 inch.        But they are closer to 11 inch, in reality.        I remember now there was something odd about the woofers in a friend's        AR11s.        The impedance curve of the AR11 was so wild I drew it out and kept a copy -        here is a listing:               DC = 4.2 ohms        10Hz = 5 ohms        32Hz = 30 ohms        100Hz = 4 ohms        500Hz = 10 ohms        1kHz = 4 ohms        2kHz = 2.5 ohms        5kHz = 2 ohms        10kHz = 2 ohms        12kHz = 2 ohms        20kHz = 3 ohms        50kHz = 8 ohms               BTW:        The low figures above 2kHz are because the 4ohm dome mid and 4ohm dome        tweeter are operating in parallel.        The owner was originally using twin wire he got from Tandy / Radio Shack (        14x0.14 stuff ) - so each run was about 1.5 ohms resistance, plus about 2.5        ohms of inductance at 15kHz.        So I made him up some leads using "Tocord" ( aka Mogami cable) with near        zero inductance and about 0.2 ohms resistance.       His mouth dropped open when he heard the difference.       .. Phil              Before completely re-forming the pair of AR9 I was given to fix, I did manage       to get one working as it may have worked when new by swapping out working       mid/HF drivers so that enough working drivers were in the same box. I found       the acoustic response        response using the middle position of mid-HF level switches was anything but       flat and extremely poor by my standards. I don't recall any HF dips to 2 ohms       as you state exists above 2kHz, but I do recall the 3.6 ohm woofers were       connected in parallel and        had a second order filter so that the current through L&C plus current       speakers summed to Z < 2 ohms, and potential amp killers.               I didn't like the switches, or the wire wrap type of connections typical of       cheap junk. I figured prevention of future problems was needed, and they could       be made to have a minimum Z of just over 4 ohms, and thus be drivable by the       customers 200W ARC        monoblocs. So the bass speakers were connected in series to raise Z, and a       damped second order LC filter used with a bar cored L to avoid Rw losses in       the L. Bass speakers were atrociously insensitive, and the acoustic levels       above 150Hz had to be all        tailored to be flat, and equal to the level of bass at 80Hz, so this allowed       resistance networks to drive the mid/treble units. The owner had given me a       pair of supposed replacement lower midrange drivers from AR, and I thought       they looked badly made,        like a cheap Chinese POS, and these were remarkably sensitive. Considerable       series R was used. The new X-over networks were mounted on new boards with all       soldered joints and losses in speaker cables due to their resistance or       inductance ceased to be a        problem - any cable could be used OK, as long at it was at least dual core       mains flex rated for 5Amps, and say 3M long, max. I've also made speaker       cables using two cat5 blue covered cables to form a twisted pair and the 8       conductors in each cable are        all soldered to a banana plug on each end. I made 3 pairs, each 6M long to get       from a power amp to 3 stacked pairs of ESL57, each had been fully re-membraned       by John Hall in Melbourne. I didn't bother measuring those cables, but I       thought they'd be fine,        and sound OK.               I've got all the info on what I did to those AR9 speakers buried in a pile of       papers a foot high which I doubt I'll ever get around to publishing. IMHO, it       is very easy to make a better pair of speakers than the AR9.        Patrick Turner.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca