home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.audio.tubes      Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11      52,877 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 52,229 of 52,877   
   Patrick Turner to All   
   Re: Guitar amp tone control calculators   
   17 Feb 14 01:05:27   
   
   From: info@turneraudio.com.au   
      
    	hugeshows 	   
   Feb 16   
   Hi Patrick,   
      
   You're totally right about the non-linear response of guitar amps in general,   
   they're notoriously curvy when you plot the response.   
      
   When you examined the response in your experiments, did you use a speaker or a   
   dummy load?  The reason I ask is because the 'full range' single driver type   
   setup most common in guitar amps leaves a lot of room for the impedance curve   
   of the speaker to    
   effect overall frequency response, often showing reduced or exaggerated   
   efficiency at certain spots.   
      
   I understand that, and most 12" drivers used in an open backed cabinet make a   
   lot more SPL between say 500Hz and 2kHz than at F outside these F.   
   Impedance isn't a huge concern because most guitar amps do in fact have maybe   
   10dB global NFB which is enough to reduce the pentode output stage Rout to   
   sensible levels.    
      
   The problem is to get meaningful amounts of boost and cut, and a lack of   
   interaction between the bass and treble and mid control if there is one.    
   The r  s  control NFB applied, fct Ha  mts    
      
   If you haven't already tried the speaker variable in your listening, I'd   
   perhaps start with at least ruling out the possibility that modern drivers   
   aren't more to blame than modern electronics.   
      
   Possibly old drivers are more sensitive than more recent mades, so all the   
   more reason why a greater variability of bass, treble and mids is needed.   
      
      
   Maybe A/B the two amps with a signal sweep and across a resistive dummy load?   
      
   I done all that, and the older one had much more bass than newer re-issue, and   
   had more treble boost.   
      
   Pink noise can also work but often loading at all frequencies changes response   
   across the spectrum in some areas, which can be misleading since guitar signal   
   (hopefully) rarely approaches pink noise in terms of spectrum use.    
      
   Tone controls offer a varying load to the tube driving them. It seems best   
   sound and tone variability occurs with 1/2 12AX7 gain tube anode direct   
   coupled to 1/2 12AX7 as a cathode follower. The Fender Deluxe has tone stack   
   driven from anode circuit,    
   while the Early Fender Twin Reverb has the CF - and the better sound by far.    
      
   Response curves with pink noise bight be quite different than with a single   
   sine or sqaure sweep.  And as much as I hate to suggest tube rolling, there's   
   always that variable to consider as well.   
      
   Different brands of 12AX7 make very little difference with what I measure,   
   although sound may change a little.    
   Its the engineering and numbers that make the most difference and the curves   
   of response with sine waves and variability. 99% of BS artists online who have   
   a lot to say about guitar amp mods often have no clue what they are talking   
   about.   
   The owner of Fender Deluxe I have here asked me to reverse the R&C parts   
   change he did himself after reading a long winded article online by a wannabe   
   guitar amp "specialist" He said the changes made no difference or made it   
   worse.   
   When I analyzed, I could see why.   
      
      
   Regards,   
      
   -forkinthesocket   
      
   I found that first need for guitar amp tone stack is to have low Rout tube   
   driving the "stack". While it could be a 12AX7 CF, when there isn't one, one   
   has to think of putting in an extra socket and tube OR using a BJT direct   
   coupled as emitter follower.    
   Maybe MJE340 will do.........   
   Collector to B+,    
   Base to gain tube anode,   
   Emitter to 56k to 0V so that Ic = 3.5mA approx.    
   This can be done easily, and the sound is determined by the gain triode,   
   as followers are very neutral sounding ( very low THD)   
      
   The Baxandal tone control gives the MOST tone variability.   
   The Deluxe has 260k log bass pot and when set at No5 level, midway rotation,   
   there is 21k below wiper and 240k above. The treble is also a 260k "log" pot   
   but with 50k below wiper and 210k above at 1/2 rotation.   
      
   The Baxandal passive tone control is the easiest to build to get a flat    
   response with B and T settings at 5. Unlike most other tone stacks designed by   
   penny pinching accountants, the Baxandal gives the most cut and boost and   
   steepest curves closest to 6dB/octave maximum possible.   
   Just what is possible as a mid control boost and cut remains to be seen    
   when I send another day on Wednesday making experiments.   
   But the Baxandal must be made carefully. I have 47k in series with bass pot,   
   then no usual shunt between top and wiper. Wiper goes to 200k to treble RC   
   array.   
   But when set at 5, bass should be flat from 1k down to 50Hz. To ensure this,   
   the ratio of 47k : 240k above pot wiper must be the same as the grounding R   
   and the 21k below wiper, so I found R = 3k9.   
   This means that for say 10V input, you get 1V output at 5, and max boost and   
   cut   
   is over +/- 12dB, enough. The 2caps used to shunt wiper to each pot end must   
   have the same XC ratio of 240k : 20k, and if R or C values are more than 10%   
   inaccurate, then you get much poorer max boost or cut, or vice versa, and the   
   best performance is    
   given with the correct R&C values and correct ratios.    
   The feed to treble boost/cut pot wiper probably will have 220k that connects   
   to 850k log volume pot. Some small C will be put from top volume pot and wiper   
   to at least neutralize the Miller of following 12AX7, and perhaps give slight   
   presence.    
      
   I have yet to figure out a mid adjustment which puts a dip up to -10dB in   
   response at 400Hz with Q a bit over 1.   
      
   The simplest things can trap me in a shed for days, but then I like to give my   
   best input before asking the owner to tray it out to see how it sounds.   
   Patrick Turner.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca