Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 52,364 of 52,877    |
|    Peter Wieck to sam_mo...@gomail.com    |
|    Re: How many tubes do I need?    |
|    24 Sep 14 14:29:22    |
      From: pfjw@aol.com              On Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:27:43 PM UTC-5, sam_mo...@gomail.com wrote:       > I want to build a computer entirely out of tubes, and be able to       >        > download and store the entire internet on it. How many tubes do I need?              Eniac, the first "practical" digital computer used only tubes as 'switches'.       Something on the order of 17,468 vacuum tubes, 7,200 crystal diodes, 1,500       relays, 70,000 resistors, 10,000 capacitors and around 5 million hand-soldered       joints went into the        machine. Parts of it still exist at Penn. Its memory was the functional       equivalent of about 2300 bits (1.3KB), although there is no actual functional       comparison of Core Memory to Flip-Flop memory. It could store (up to) ten (10)       signed (+/-) ten-digit        numbers, full stop.               It had less computing and/or memory capacity than the Commodore VIC 20. Which       had five (5) KB of ram, of which 1.5KB was system memory. Power consumption       for the ENIAC was about 160KW/H.               Extrapolating Wildly: If the internet memory capacity is 58 petabytes (each       petabyte being 1,000 terabytes) the memory capacity requirement would be quite       large - but TUBES did not store the actual data, only processed it. So, you       would have to consider        the number of tubes to make a reasonable processing time, and the number of       tubes, capacitors and flip-flop devices (analog relays) to store the data.       Then the power to run it all.               Comes to 10 to the 15KB. 10 to the 42 bytes.               Raw numbers only, and definitely comparing apples (flip-flop) to oranges       (core), and all approximations:              Keeping in mind that a typical memory chip has something over (the equivalent       of) 40,000,000 discrete components on it, with CPU chips having much, much       more, the number of vacuum tubes will be in the several billions. But, for       practical purposes, if        only one billion tubes are used ENIAC style, that would require, with       supporting infrastructure, about 10 MW/H of power, about the equivalent of the       entire output of two (2) standard nuclear plants.               2,830,000,000,000 hand-soldered joints (again, assuming ENIAC-style). Assume       10,000 assemblers making 180 joints per hour. That math will be astounding.       Not to mention floor-space required, cooling considerations, access, and so on       and so forth.              So, the short answer:              More tubes than have been produced world-wide since 1910.       Something far over 2 square miles of footprint. ENIAC was only 1,800 s.f., but       remember, access, heat and memory issues using relays.               Interesting exercise in silliness.              Peter Wieck       Melrose Park, PA (and Penn grad).               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca