Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 52,471 of 52,877    |
|    Patrick Turner to tub...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: 1/2 12BH7??    |
|    23 Jan 16 15:23:49    |
      From: info@turneraudio.com.au              On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 05:52:28 UTC+11, tub...@gmail.com wrote:       > Hello!       > Which tube is equivalent to 1/2 12BH7?       >         Mr Wieck typed....              "The standard equivalent in use today is the 12AU7, with perhaps a little bit       less gain on the latter.       There are those who find that they are indistinguishable as drivers in       low-power amps, favoring the 12BH7 over the 12AU in higher-power amps."               Just who says the 12AU7 "the standard equivalent" to 12BH7? The 12BH7 has a       much lower Ra and higher Gm, and although both BH7 and AU7 are able to be used       in the same audio circuit along with 6CG7, the BH7 has a significantly higher       Ea swing because the        Ra curve for EG1=0 is a more vertical line than in the AU7 or CG7.       I built and sold countless new and re-engineered amps to my customers, and       some used BH7 for driver tubes, especially where drive voltage to output grids       exceeded 50Vrms max. McIntosh used 12BH7 to drive 6550 output tubes where       drive voltage could exceed        150Vrms, because the 6550 was set up with its anode and cathode Vac being from       1/2 of the two OPT primary windings for anode and cathode, ie, where Ea =       +450V, Va-k in each 6550 could be 400Vpk, ie 280Vrms, so Va = Vk = 140Vrms,       with opposite phases.       If the 6550 gain = 10, then Vg-k = 28Vrms, so Vg-0V = 28+140 = 168Vrms!!       To achieve this easily, the dc carrying anode RL of BH7 in MC60 = 12k and fed       from a same phase point on OPT with 140Vrms, ie, the BH7 anode was       bootstrapped to make its anode load an effectively a much higher number of       ohms, about 100k, while keeping Ea        of BH7 about +380V. Its a case of mild positive FB, which tends to boost THD,       but because the BH7 has low Ra, the PFB effect is minimized because the Ra of       BH7 and Rla 12k form a resistance divider reducing PFB by -12dB approx.       But no matter how how high the value of BH7 RLa, the triode still has to swing       the rather high anode swing, and my load line analysis reveals BH7 is better       than AU7 at this job. I figured BH7 could swing just over 230Vrms max, and AU7       over 205Vrms.        McIntosh would have sussed out all this long ago. But now most ppl will miss       making distinctions between tube types because they have forgotten how to do       load line analysis and they refuse to ask WHY very much and they make a       statement based on        superficial assessment of tube properties.              I have not included the consequences of McIntosh's use of a cathode follower       after BH7 to directly drive output tube grids, but they do have CF and with       bootstrapped cathode RL, so that output tubes can be driven a bit AB2, so       squeeze the very most        anyone can from a 6550, while keeping the total anode load ohms for BH7 high       as humanly possible, and affordable, without using a separate choke feed to       BH7 anodes. The CF has high gain but follower connection reduces this to just       under 1.0, so its gain        effects on BH7 gain may be neglected here in this context.              The AU7 used to replace BH7 in McIntosh MC60 will mean gain of driver stage is       reduced slightly, because Gain A = µ x RL / ( RL + Ra ) and the higher Ra for       AU7 always means gain will be lower. If the Va = 168Vrms max, and BH7 gain =       16, then its grid        drive = 10.5Vrms, and AU7 might need 12Vrms, but all this is while the OPT       voltages have not sagged much with load; when they do sag, the AU7 gets less       bootstrapping so its gain falls more than BH7,and correctional effects of GNFB       is reduced. Its just        another reason why McIntosh favoured BH7.                       So just how you use 12BH7 or 12AU7 should be carefully considered if you want       the best possible performance, ie, wide Va swing, low THD, and reliability,       and low Ra effect on bandwidth and FB.               But where the BH7 or AU7 are used in circuits for low Va swings including       preamps, their function is very similar, and both are similar to 6CG7 / 6SN7 /       6BL7 and maybe a few ECC euro twin triodes. All these medium µ triodes produce       hi-fi audio        amplification so easily......               Patrick Turner.                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca