Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 52,485 of 52,877    |
|    Patrick Turner to All    |
|    Re: My God, I can't believe this still e    |
|    09 Apr 16 20:47:53    |
      From: info@turneraudio.com.au              On 03/30/16 07:27, Patrick Turner so wittily quipped:        - show quoted text -       sure, given big enough output components, 500VDC at 2A or even more is        not unreasonable. "big fat MOSFET" devices switching high volts, or        IGFETs if they can switch fast enough. Old-style computer power        supplies were upwards of 250W in their day, so just take that kind of        power and some large enough capacitors.               But I see no schematics I could build, anywhere.....              the microcontroller simply measures the voltage and generates the PWM        signal. That signal would then be amplified and passed along to the        output stage. So it doesn't really matter what the output stage looks        like as long as you handle 'crossover' properly and get it to        efficiently switch whatever supply volts you feed it with.               I guess the mosfets are either ON or OFF, and in either state have very low       Pdd, so hence the efficiency.               > I don't much understand SMPS, but I guess if the 240Vrms sine wave mains is       rectified to make +324Vdc, then it possibly can be switched to give a +/-       324Vpk square wave at say 100kHz, and then applied to HF tranny to raise       slightly to give between +       324Vdc to maybe +648Vdc and power a rectifier to make the Vdc rails that are       isolated from mains for safety.               normally an isolation transformer would be on the output, usually a fat        toroid with only a handful of turns on it running in the hundreds of        khz. open up your typical computer power supply for examples. So yeah.               The output of that could then be fed to "whatever". What I would        probably do is use 250V out of that transformer with a very wide input        range, 100VAC to 250VAC for example, like a typical switcher would do.        You then take its output [typically running in a 'burst' mode], filter        that, and feed the main switcher with it.              Aha, "burst" mode, does that mean "pumped up until it bursts"? or "Bloody       Underpowered Revised Silly Technical?" or both?                A separate one for low volts        would be there as well, maybe +/- 15V for supplying the heaters and low        volts supplies, and +250v for high volts.               Yes but all the good tube amps with 6550 et all have B+ at least +430Vdc. Amps       with cathode bias and 845 need 1,250Vdc. So hence the need to be able to       easily get higher than your +250V, and then scale back to what's needed.               you just use a        diode+capacitor full-wave multiplier [because transformers are        expensive].               Well, it all has to work at maybe 500kHz. That's a bit more difficult than       +/-12Vdc because the higher the Vdc, the longer it takes for rise times. Such       a lot of RF energy lurking in the box....              Just need to watch ESR on any electrolytics, and filter        with bypassing ceramic capacitor. multi-layer ceramic capacitors should        ALSO have a bypass, although I have not seen one with a published ESR.               The basic idea is to run a combination of 'burst mode' and PWM mode        driving the multiplier to regulate the output voltage. This is not a        new idea (boost/buck converters do this all the time) but I have my own        twist on it.               We wait and see.                     > SMPS are not well accepted by Hi-Fi ppl, but Halcro used them in their       hi-end 200W amps, and many professional PA amps used SMPS with quite high +/-       rails and very high Po for the weight of the amp.               exactly! purists can have their iron weights if they want to, and tube        rectifiers to go with it. I doubt they affect the audio quality.        [except for guitar amps, which have a distinctive sound when overloaded,        when a tube rectifier is used].               I agree that all the tubes need to sing for hi-fi is a battery like PSU, and       it don't matter what produces the Vdc. Guitar amps get some gravvely sounding       IMD when they clip the amp with deep overdrive and there's a lot of 120,100Hz       in series with 1/2        primaries in AB mode from low value reservoir caps and no LC filtering.       The B+ goes down on overdrive, and comes back up as notes fade, so sustaining       the sustain longer. Guitar amps used for recordings of Mozart make ol' Moetsy       sound real crook.              > The schematics are never in the public domain, all are trade secrets.               If I built this as a product, I'd probably open source the hardware and        sell the boards to make $, through someone like Sparkfun. Having a        board made, even if you have the layout, generally costs more than        buying one from a company that builds them in bulk and sells them at a        profit.               [I figured output boards and a control board. the FCC on the control        board would be expensive, but you could keep some frequencies low enough        (<9khz) to avoid FCC testing on the driver boards too.]               the software wouldn't have to be open source necessarily, but it could        be, and be licensed for free "for use with an approved board".        knockoffs will happen anyway, but at least this way you couldn't legally        ship product using plagiarized software.               [but I'd license it cheap to someone who DID want to ship it with their        own hardware, I mean why not]              Waddawee want? To build it in the shed. When? after we buy the bits easy, How?       afta readin an easy schematic.              Having to navigate around the restrictions and secrets seems like far too much       trubble, and that's why so few ppl in DIY land would ever build any SMPS. I've       known blokes to build heavy linear PSU for their PC, just a silent box, no       heat, no fans, and        unlikely to suffer if lightning brings a huge pulse down Cat-5 cables at phone       /data inputs. Lightning stuffed PSU 5 years ago in my PC, then the HD failed 3       months later, been OK since though. PIA wennit appens.              Patrick Turner.               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca