Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 52,545 of 52,877    |
|    Andre Jute to boomer#...@none.com    |
|    Re: What is the most powerful audio outp    |
|    14 Dec 16 08:25:21    |
      From: fiultra1@yahoo.com              On Thursday, December 8, 2016 at 3:20:48 PM UTC, boomer#...@none.com wrote:       > What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage       > output?               There is a self-contradiction in this question. There are lots of really       powerful tubes but they aren't audio tubes; many sound like shit. There is,       even today, plenty of choice in quality audio tubes that sound great, but they       aren't necessarily all        that powerful. In hi-fi, furthermore, it is accepted that you sacrifice some       of the available power to operate the tube on the flattest part of its       transfer curve, so that mitigates against hogging out all the available power.       Also, the most refined        audio sound comes from triode tubes, which are pretty inefficient, meaning you       need lots or very big, not ones to make any appreciable power.              However, unlike some of the advice that you're getting here from people who've       never built or heard a big tube amp, there are ways to get around it. First of       all, you can parallel standard tubes like KT88 to your heart's content (well,       actually the depth        of your pocket, because the custom iron will cost plenty); I had a big OTL       KT88 amp built as a modular rack mount system that by rewiring would give any       output you wanted; it took up two bays; but it sounded like what it was, a PA       system. Even the humble        EL34 can build into a very potent amp: I got 96W of high quality audio sound       out of parallel push-pull tubes running in class A/B with toroidal trannies in       a stereo amp that two people could handle with ease, one with some difficulty;       for home use it had        18W in Class A, so the massive oomph was rarely needed.              Next, some of the broadcast tubes sound fabulous, for instance the 845       broadcast triode, and you can parallel triodes in single-ended output for the       finest sound of all, zero negative feedback SE, same as you can pentodes in       push-pull. For instance, my        80W SE amps were deliberately operated at only a fraction of theoretical       output to linearize the sound. I could as easily have chosen your 500W output       if I were willing to sacrifice some sound quality; instead I put the time and       the money into high-       sensitivity speakers.               None of this throws up insuperable technical problems. The biggest problem of       big amps is in fact the availability and cost of very high voltage connectors       for the separate components, or the monstrous weight if you build the thing in       one unit. For my        80W SE amp, Menno van der Veen designed the transformers for me, and Plitron       wound them, and listed them for the intrepid. But it is long since broken up       as too heavy, too hot, too large, too dangerous, just too unnecessary. The       booster amp, 3.8W of SE        300B, with a bicor horn turned out to produce all the sound pressure I       actually need. (A booster amp is a complete small power amp you use to drive a       much larger power amp.) Don't laugh. When a sports field across the street       from my house annoyed me with        their unshielded PA, I coupled my 3.8W 300B SE amp and bicor horns to the       stairwell in my four-storey town house, opened the front doors, and blasted       their premier event of the year into incoherence. They scrapped the offending       PA the next day.              ***       If you're just building a humongous amp to prove you're a swinging dick,       great, I admire initiative and balls and magnificent obsessions. But if you       have a real problem to solve, like x sound pressure in y spatial volume, I       suggest you redefine your need        working backwards from the speakers: if your speakers are sensitive, a Bessel       Array or bicor horns, the amp soon gets down to a practical size and       electrical requirement and the costs start approximating reality as she is       lived.               For a Bessel Array, try the brief introduction here:        http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/JUTE%20on%20BESSEL.htm        And the smallest of my bicor horns looks like this inside:        http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20194%20T91HWAF3.jpg               Andre Jute              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca