From: pfjw@aol.com   
      
   On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 10:07:17 AM UTC-5, Big Bad Bob wrote:   
       
   > I have to wonder whether or not a 'hybrid' design (part fixed, part   
   > cathode) might be better...   
      
   Forgive an analogy:   
      
   Back in the day, VW had drum brakes on all four wheels, typically made by ATE.   
   They used a fairly basic star adjuster system accessed through a hole in the   
   the drum with a flat-bladed screwdriver. This was when pretty much every other   
   maker (Except    
   Mercedes) had switched to self-adjusting (drum) brakes. Once upon a time, VW   
   was asked why they maintained the user-adjust system instead of the   
   then-cheaper self-adjust option.    
      
   They answered: Self adjusting brakes are never excellent. Most if the time,   
   they are barely good, as they adjust only when on the edge of failure (true at   
   the time). Our brakes can be excellent.    
      
   At about 5 minutes per month, I can make sure that my bias is dead-on,   
   adjusted to the type and age of tubes in place, and changed as needed. Not so   
   easy with other systems. *Although I also have an amp built that way that is   
   just fine.*   
      
   Now, very nearly everybody uses disc brakes and the issue is moot.     
      
   Peter Wieck   
   Melrose Park, PA   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)