Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.audio.tubes    |    Tube-based amplifiers... that go to 11    |    52,877 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 52,624 of 52,877    |
|    strstr1112@gmail.com to David Anderson    |
|    Re: Marantz 7--Why so expensive??    |
|    19 Aug 17 18:34:32    |
      On Tuesday, October 20, 1998 at 4:00:00 PM UTC+9, David Anderson wrote:       > Hi,       >       > I don't want to start a price-flame war, but I'm simply curious as to why       > Marantz 7 preamps command such high prices compared to other tube preamps       > of their era.       >       > I've looked at a schematic for the Marantz preamp, and it appears to me to       > be a well-implemented, but fairly conventional, design. I have seen one       > opened up for service, before, though I've never heard one in operation,       > and the only unusual thing I noticed was the placement of the tubes. In       > fact, it doesn't seem to differ too much in terms of circuit design from       > the McIntosh C22 preamp, which I've seen offered at somewhat lower prices.       >       > In fact, for $2-3K, it seems to me that you could build a really good       > preamp--one that had far fewer switches in the signal path than the       > Marantz 7 and one that had things like a stepped attenuator volume       > control. For that matter, it wouldn't be hard to duplicate the Marantz       > design. Power amps are harder to copy due to the output transformers, but       > preamps are generally built from commonly available parts.       >       > So, are the high prices just due to collectors value--the thrill one gets       > from owning something with a certain name and number on it--or is there       > something else that I'm missing?       >       > Regards,       > David Anderson       >       > --       > I refuse to accept any unauthorized or unsolicited E-mail       > communications.       >       > The sending of an unsolicited E-mail communication shall       > be proof that the sender has agreed, by action, to send $500.00       > US/ certified funds to me, prior to any unsolicited or unauthorized       > transmission.       >       > "By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer       > meets the definition of a telephone fax machine.       > By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited       > advertisement to such equipment.       > By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is       > punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500,       > whichever is greater, for each violation."              When the buyers go crazy, the sellers go crazy to counter... Thats why the 7's       are selling like crazy with unreasonably high prices              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca