From: johnwilliamson@btinternet.com   
      
   On 06/03/2024 21:42, Tobiah wrote:   
   > On 2/19/24 08:21, John Williamson wrote:   
   >> Apart from the spammers?   
   >   
   > Like spirits with unresolved Earthly business,   
   > we glide through the hallways trying to find   
   > out whether there is really any benefit to sample   
   > rates above 44.1k, and whether Pro-tools does anything   
   > useful that Reaper can't.  :)   
   >   
   >   
    When I am editing or cleaning up a recording, the higher sample   
   rates let me do a better job. When listening at home, at my age, the HF   
   limit is in my ears, not the equipment.   
      
   As for the Pro Tools against Reaper thing, it depends on what you count   
   as useful. One good point about Pro Tools, though, is that I can use   
   files from and send files to just about any professional mixing facility   
   and know they will drop into their workflow with no trouble, while   
   Reaper tends to be used more at the home studio end of the market.   
      
   --   
   Tciao for Now!   
      
   John.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)