Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.tech    |    Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al    |    117,728 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 115,860 of 117,728    |
|    bigbadwolf44@outlook.com to John S.    |
|    Re: OK to eliminate the PCV valve?    |
|    26 Jun 20 03:31:19    |
      On Thursday, June 8, 2006 at 8:36:55 PM UTC-4, John S. wrote:       > j wrote:       > > I am not a mechanic, but this is in regards to a 1994 Chevrolet Corsica       with       > > a 6 cylinder engine that has 138,000 miles on it, is still in very good       > > condition, and has always had Mobil 1 synthetic oil.       >       > It is clear from the rest of this post that you are not a mechanic.       >       >       > >       > > It is my contention that the PCV valve, on an engine this old, is likely to       > > decrease the engine life due to the fact that it is introducing       contaminants       > > into the intake and cumbustion chamber.       >       > And on from which automotive expert are you getting this information.       >       >       > >       > > In order to make my car last longer, I am thinking of permanently removing       > > the PCV valve and replacing it with a homemade filter, but leaving the hose       > > that the PCV valve is connected to unplugged all the time and hanging in       the       > > air with the homemade filter attached. In other words, I will unplug the       PCV       > > valve and throw it away, leave the hose hanging in the air, and where the       > > PCV valve had formerly been attached to the hose there will be a filter       > > (primarily to prevent bugs and dust from entering the engine).       > >       > > Where the PCV valve had formerly been plugged into the valve cover, I will       > > place a homemade filter in the hole on the valve cover. This will allow to       > > crankcase to ventilate, but there will be no longer be any sucking action.       I       > > remember as a child seeing "oil breather caps" on valve covers. I don't see       > > any reason why this technique shouldn't work on a modern engine.       > >       > > However, not being a mechanic, I would rather have some qualified guidance       > > from this newsgroup prior to pursuing this idea any further than the       thought       > > stage. I have already plugged my EGR valve port to prevent it from       > > introducing contaminants into the engine and the engine seems to be idling       > > smoother, so why not do the same with the PCV valve?       >       > The guidance is...NO!              What an arrogant ass...talking down to this guy like that..shame              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca