Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.tech    |    Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al    |    117,728 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 115,876 of 117,728    |
|    AMuzi to thekmanrocks@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Tire Pressure Gauges - Analog Vs. Di    |
|    02 Jul 20 07:49:50    |
      From: am@yellowjersey.org              On 7/1/2020 2:21 PM, thekmanrocks@gmail.com wrote:       > Steve W.       >       > I guess more broadly: mechanical/analog gauges more directly measure the       tire pressure, vs       > digital models, which probably use some algorithm to determine the pressure?       >       > Again, I've spent two months with more than one digital tire gauge, and       after experiencing       > both their good and bad sides, I'm actually longing for the simplicity of an       analog gauge again.       > I'm hoping the $40-something I'm paying for my yet-to-arrive Longacre Analog       'Deluxe' will       > show improvements in quality and particularly consistency of reading,       compared to the $10 or       > so I paid, 5 and 10 years ago, for Accu Gage's S60X dial-face model that was       my go-to for       > ten years until recently.       >              Reliability/repeatability varies a lot so I have no opinion       but of non-digital gauges, there are spring type (like       Milton, Tech) and there are actual Bourdon tube type       (AccuGauge, Kingsbridge). Even between those I'm sure some       china factory could screw up accuracy of a Bourdon tube so       technical design and actual product may be very different.              --       Andrew Muzi        |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca