Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.tech    |    Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al    |    117,728 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 115,918 of 117,728    |
|    Xeno to All    |
|    Re: What metric do you use to estimate r    |
|    11 Aug 20 15:17:25    |
      From: xenolith@optusnet.com.au              On 11/8/20 4:10 am, N8N wrote:       > On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 12:28:48 PM UTC-4, Steve W. wrote:       >> Arlen Holder wrote:       >>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:04:50 -0700 (PDT), trader_4 wrote:       >>>       >>>> Every pad I've installed for decades has had them, including the ones that       >>>> use electric wear sensors.       >>>       >>> How many miles do you get per front pads, in general?       >>>       >>> As for mechanical sensors, my bimmer has only one wear sensor per axle       >>> o No mechanical sensor; only electronic (front left and rear right).       >>>       >>> Although electronic is essentially mechanical, since it's a stub of plastic       >>> that wears on contact, exposing the wires embedded inside that plastic.       >>>       >>> One issue is removing the sensors often breaks them if you're not careful.       >>>       >>> Since we rotate so frequently, checking brakes are easy; but this question       >>> was for estimating miles for someone else who doesn't rotate as frequently       >>> as I do (due to mountainous terrain causing specific "camber scrub" wear to       >>> the inboard corners of the front tires).       >>>       >>> At the moment, with the data we have, it's about 4,000 miles per pad mm.       >>       >> There is no rule of thumb for brake wear because it depends more on the       >> driver, vehicle location and the pad materials than anything else.       >>       >> Drive out in the plains where the only hills are long and low and the       >> brake wear is going to be much different than if you live in the       >> rockies. Same with driving in New York City versus San Fransisco.       >>       >> Another factor is the vehicle itself and how it is set up. Some will       >> chew through brakes fast while others barely nibble. Some will go       >> through brakes in 40K or less while others might make it to the junkyard       >> on the OEM rears pads.       >>       >>       >> The Journey we have had all the brakes done by the dealer with OEM       >> parts prior to our purchase, They have about 55K on them and the fronts       >> are worn maybe 1/2 way. The rears however were just replaced, but not       >> for wear, the rotors rusted into junk and damaged the pads. So it got       >> new NAPA coated rotors and premium ceramics to see how they work on it,       >> have had very good service from them on many other vehicles.       >>       >       > Another factor is riveted vs. bonded linings, you can run a bonded lining a       lot thinner than a riveted one. 5mm might be thiiiiiis close to grinding the       rivet heads.       >       > nate       >       Rivets? In this era? Bonded shoes are all I have seen for *decades*.              --              Xeno                     Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.        (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca