home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.tech      Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al      117,728 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 116,551 of 117,728   
   Xeno to Jacob Jones   
   Re: `red-lining   
   04 Mar 22 17:19:58   
   
   XPost: alt.home.repair   
   From: xenolith@optusnet.com.au   
      
   On 4/3/2022 9:51 am, Jacob Jones wrote:   
   > On Fri, 04 Mar 2022 09:37:46 +1100, Bob F  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 3/3/2022 12:59 PM, Jacob Jones wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 04 Mar 2022 07:49:46 +1100, Bob F  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 3/3/2022 12:03 PM, micky wrote:   
   >>>>> In alt.home.repair, on Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:47:28 -0600, Paul in Houston   
   >>>>> TX  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> micky wrote:   
   >>>>>>> Is red-lining worse, better, or the same when the engine is   
   >>>>>>> driving the   
   >>>>>>> wheels as when the wheels are driving the engine?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I use the engine to slow down when going down hill, and today, for   
   >>>>>>> example, I put the ATransmission into 2nd and then engine went   
   >>>>>>> briefly   
   >>>>>>> to 5500, the apparent red line.   For several seconds was at 5000   
   >>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>> even longer at 4500.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I did that exiting the freeway in my last Toyota.   
   >>>>>> It sucked a valve into the combustion chamber and broke a piston rod   
   >>>>>> destroying the engine.  I gave it away to a needy person who   
   >>>>>> installed a   
   >>>>>> used engine and ended up with a nice car.   
   >>>>>  So you're suggesting I shouldn't do it?   
   >>>>>  Unless your freeway was going very steeply down hill, I would   
   >>>>> think you   
   >>>>> came close to the redline even less time than I have!!   
   >>>>>  This is a 2021 or 2022 Citroen C-3.  A rental with only 9000 miles on   
   >>>>> it, so it must be new.   I think I bought the insurance, but   
   >>>>> regardless,   
   >>>>> I don't want to hurt the car.    mAYBE I shouldnt go lower than 3rd   
   >>>>> gear   
   >>>>> and rely on the brakes for anything more.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> A motorcycle shop owner heard me downshift to slow as I approached   
   >>>> his lot, and immediately told me that brakes were a lot cheaper to   
   >>>> replace than engine and clutch.   
   >>>  Rather a silly comment if you end up crashing because the brakes   
   >>> overheat and you can't stop.   
   >   
   >> He was right.   
   >   
   > No he was not when you change down before there will be any red lining.   
   >   
   >> Reving to high speeds to slow down can quickly damage your  engine.   
   >   
   > But changing down so you don't redline doesnt.   
   >   
   >> That should not be general practice if you care about your  vehicle.   
   >   
   > That's wrong too. Doing it properly does produce less brake wear.   
      
   So does driving that saves wear and tear on both brakes and clutch. If a   
   driver has a need to brake hard, either way, maybe it's time to re-learn   
   how to drive.   
   >   
   >> If your brakes fail on a steep hill, OK. But doing that rather than   
   >> keeping your speed below the over-rev point going down hills is just   
   >> stupid. Use your brakes for exiting the freeway, definitely better   
   >> than over-reving.   
   >   
   > But perfectly possible to not over rev in that situation.   
      
      
   --   
   Xeno   
      
      
   Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.   
          (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca