home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.tech      Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al      117,728 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 116,585 of 117,728   
   Xeno to Jacob Jones   
   Re: `red-lining (1/2)   
   07 Mar 22 18:59:30   
   
   XPost: alt.home.repair   
   From: xenolith@optusnet.com.au   
      
   On 7/3/2022 4:07 pm, Jacob Jones wrote:   
   > On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:56:35 +1100, Xeno  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 7/3/2022 2:58 pm, Jacob Jones wrote:   
   >>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:43:49 +1100, Xeno    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 4/3/2022 7:48 pm, Jacob Jones wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 04 Mar 2022 17:19:58 +1100, Xeno    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 4/3/2022 9:51 am, Jacob Jones wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Mar 2022 09:37:46 +1100, Bob F    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 3/3/2022 12:59 PM, Jacob Jones wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Mar 2022 07:49:46 +1100, Bob F    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 3/3/2022 12:03 PM, micky wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In alt.home.repair, on Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:47:28 -0600, Paul   
   >>>>>>>>>>> in Houston   
   >>>>>>>>>>> TX  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> micky wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Is red-lining worse, better, or the same when the engine is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> driving the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> wheels as when the wheels are driving the engine?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> I use the engine to slow down when going down hill, and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> today, for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> example, I put the ATransmission into 2nd and then engine   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> went briefly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> to 5500, the apparent red line.   For several seconds was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5000 and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> even longer at 4500.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I did that exiting the freeway in my last Toyota.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> It sucked a valve into the combustion chamber and broke a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> piston rod   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> destroying the engine.  I gave it away to a needy person who   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> installed a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> used engine and ended up with a nice car.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>  So you're suggesting I shouldn't do it?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>  Unless your freeway was going very steeply down hill, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>> would think you   
   >>>>>>>>>>> came close to the redline even less time than I have!!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>  This is a 2021 or 2022 Citroen C-3.  A rental with only 9000   
   >>>>>>>>>>> miles on   
   >>>>>>>>>>> it, so it must be new.   I think I bought the insurance, but   
   >>>>>>>>>>> regardless,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I don't want to hurt the car.    mAYBE I shouldnt go lower   
   >>>>>>>>>>> than 3rd gear   
   >>>>>>>>>>> and rely on the brakes for anything more.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> A motorcycle shop owner heard me downshift to slow as I   
   >>>>>>>>>> approached his lot, and immediately told me that brakes were a   
   >>>>>>>>>> lot cheaper to replace than engine and clutch.   
   >>>>>>>>>  Rather a silly comment if you end up crashing because the   
   >>>>>>>>> brakes overheat and you can't stop.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> He was right.   
   >>>>>>>  No he was not when you change down before there will be any red   
   >>>>>>> lining.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Reving to high speeds to slow down can quickly damage your  engine.   
   >>>>>>>  But changing down so you don't redline doesnt.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That should not be general practice if you care about your   
   >>>>>>>> vehicle.   
   >>>>>>>  That's wrong too. Doing it properly does produce less brake wear.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So does driving that saves wear and tear on both brakes and   
   >>>>>> clutch. If a driver has a need to brake hard, either way, maybe   
   >>>>>> it's time to re-learn how to drive.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>  We aren't talking about braking hard, we are talking how to   
   >>>>> descend steep hills.   
   >>>   
   >>>> No,   
   >>>  Fraid so.   
   >>>   
   >>>> *we* are talking about using engine braking as opposed to using the   
   >>>> service brakes. You shouldn't be using the engine to slow down on a   
   >>>> hill, that's what the service brakes are for.   
   >   
   >>>  Wrong with a long steep descent.   
   >   
   >> You slow down *before* you begin your descent.   
   >   
   > What I said long ago.   
   >   
   >> Once into the descent at an *appropriate speed*, you only use the   
   >> service brakes to maintain the rate of descent, the engine braking   
   >> taking care of the rest.   
   >   
   > You have that backwards.   
      
   You don't appear to have it at all.   
   >   
   >> It's  obvious you have never driven trucks.   
   >   
   > There you go again, face down in the mud, as always.   
   >   
   > And we aren't discussing trucks, we are discussing a medium sized SUV.   
      
   Techniques are the same, just way more critical with a fully loaded truck.   
   >   
   >>>> What you can, and should,  do is use engine  brakingto maintain a   
   >>>> steady speed down a steep hill.   
   >   
   >>>  Doesn't have to be a steady speed when the slope changes a lot.   
   >   
   >> Again, that's when you *briefly* apply the service brakes.   
   >   
   > Or change down initially and don't need the brakes if it is a long steep   
   > descent.   
      
   You appear to be somewhat clueless.   
   >   
   >>>> That is the precise scenario where your service brakes can overheat   
   >>>  What I said long ago.   
   >   
   >>>> and  that is to be avoided at all costs if brake fade is to be avoided.   
   >   
   >>>  Whether you get brake faded depends on how long the steep descent   
   >>> goes  for.   
   >   
   >> Whether you get brake fade depends on your approach to the   
   >> descent;how  you manage your speed, both when entering and during the   
   >> descent.   
   >   
   > But you don't get brake fade with a modern car like that unless it is a   
   > long steep descent.   
      
   Only one thing I can say in response to that - BULLSHIT!   
   >   
   >>>> If  needed, should the vehicle still speed up, an occasional   
   >>>> application of the service brakes is advised but no more than is   
   >>>> required to maintain a steady speed.   
   >   
   >>>  No need for a steady speed. Fine if it varies for hairpin bends etc.   
   >   
   >> Again, you appear never to have driven trucks or,for that matter, any   
   >> heavy vehicle.   
   >   
   > Then you need new glasses bad and that is irrelevant to   
   > your silly line about a constant speed. Only a fool like you   
   > would maintain a constant speed in a truck or heavy vehicle,   
   > at the speed it has to do the worst hairpin bend at and there   
   > is no way to know what speed that will be in advance anyway.   
      
   You are just trying to confuse the situation.   
   >   
   >>>> That way you neither damage your engine   
   >   
   >>>  You don't need a steady speed to avoid damaging the engine,   
   >>> just don't exceed the redline.   
   >   
   >>>> or needlessly  overheat the service brakes.   
   >   
   >>>  What I said long ago.   
   >   
   >>>>>>>> If your brakes fail on a steep hill, OK. But doing that rather   
   >>>>>>>> than keeping your speed below the over-rev point going down   
   >>>>>>>> hills is just stupid. Use your brakes for exiting the freeway,   
   >>>>>>>> definitely better than over-reving.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>  But perfectly possible to not over rev in that situation.   
      
      
   --   
   Xeno   
      
      
   Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.   
          (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca