Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.tech    |    Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al    |    117,728 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,635 of 117,728    |
|    Thomas to Xeno    |
|    Re: "Google Wallet may be making a retur    |
|    30 Apr 22 15:44:18    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone       From: canope234@gmail.com              On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 7:30:43 PM, Xeno wrote:              >> ...but they won't cause it on the outside edge of the front inside tire...       >>       >> ...as that tire is only lightly loaded (load transfers to the outside       >> tires when turning)...       >       > Nothing to do with load transfer. Effect occurs even at low speeds.              Does weight transfer to the front tires on a steep downhill turn have a       compounding wear effect over and above the increased camber based scrub       radius on the inside tire outside edge on those tight turns?              >> If it rolls to the outside as a car ACTUALLY DOES, then the tire will       >> probably still have negative camber.       >       > Think about KPI/SAI and its effect on camber in turns. You are only       > thinking of camber gain in bump and/or rebound.              Since kingpin angle (like castor angle) contributes to wheel camber       increases with increasing steering input at any speed or inclination, do       you think a slight decrease in positive caster might lessen the inevitable       camber scrub effect on the outside edge of the inside front tire on tight       turns?              Would the drawback be decreased stability on the bumpy level straights?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca