Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.tech    |    Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al    |    117,728 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,650 of 117,728    |
|    Thomas to Xeno    |
|    Re: "Google Wallet may be making a retur    |
|    30 Apr 22 22:52:38    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone       From: canope234@gmail.com              On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 9:36:49 PM, Xeno wrote:              >> Yes. The geometries all tie in together such that even a perfectly aligned       >> vehicle will prematurely wear the outside edge of the front tire on the       >> inside of a curve if they frequently negotiate slow speed tight turns.       >>       >> Is that your understanding of the net result on premature tire wear as a       >> result of the suspension geometry changes if a vehicle negotiates hundreds       >> of slow speed tight turns daily?       >       > Yes, my understanding precisely. And my car has to negotiate a lot of       > such tight turns on a daily basis, tighter to the left because we are in       > RHD country, on the right for LHD country. That's why I use the terms;       > nearside and offside rather than left side and right side. Anyway, the       > outside of my left front tyre is always rearing the most, that's why I       > need to rotate tyres regularly.              Moving forward on that topic, I thank you for giving a rationale why it's       the nearside tire that wears its outside edge the most on twisty roads.              One confusion I still have is about the magnitude of the wear between the       nearside tire outside edge and the farside tire inside edge on a lock turn.              Knowing that the farside camber goes from negative to more negative, and       the nearside camber goes from negative to positive, aren't both tires at an       'extreme' camber when at the middle of the sharp curve?              If the magnitude of the farside negative camber was the same as the       magnitude of the nearside positive camber on those turns, wouldn't the wear       equal out over time given we can assume about equal number of left turns as       right turns?              I suspect that the magnitude of the positive camber on the nearside tire is       GREATER than the magnitude of the negative camber on the farside tire.              Is that the case?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca