Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.tech    |    Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al    |    117,728 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,664 of 117,728    |
|    Xeno to Michael Trew    |
|    Re: "Google Wallet may be making a retur    |
|    03 May 22 15:34:44    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android       From: xenolith@optusnet.com.au              On 3/5/2022 11:24 am, Michael Trew wrote:       > On 5/2/2022 12:27, Alan wrote:       >> On 2022-05-02 7:34 a.m., Michael Trew wrote:       >>>       >>> Why is a tire larger than 18 inches ever necessary for a       >>> non-commercial vehicle? I don't think I've ever had a vehicle (I've       >>> owned well over 30 vehicles) with a larger than 15 inch diameter       >>> tire. That includes my F-150 and C10 trucks. My '97 Chrysler LHS       >>> *might* have had 16" tires, at the largest. I hate needlessly large       >>> modern trucks and SUV's.       >>       >> You mean a 15" diameter WHEEL, don't you?       >       > Yes.       >       >> Larger wheels on high performance vehicles allow for larger brakes, and       >> while larger brakes won't actually stop you any quicker for a single       >> stop, their greater heat capacity will mean they fade less when doing       >> multiple stops/slowings.       >       > Eh, I don't know, I guess I'm biased. I drive old beaters; most of my       > cars are pre-1990.              I haven't had a pre-1990 car since 1995. Now I don't even want a pre       2020 car.              --       Xeno                     Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.        (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca