XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: spam@nospam.com   
      
   nospam wrote:   
      
   > but at least you somewhat understand that high current demands requires   
   > low internal resistance, which means that when the internal resistance   
   > increases due to age, it reduces the peak loads a battery can source.   
      
   I was _wondering_ why you always disagree with what _everyone_ knows about   
   internal resistance of (real) current sources (theoretical ones aside),   
   until you made that statement above - which tells me why you hate facts.   
      
   I didn't say anything about internal resistance changing over time where   
   the fact becomes obvious by what you just said given you're always trying   
   to claim Apple has some super secret battery chemistry that _only_ kicks in   
   when phones need to be _secretly_ throttled.   
      
   This is despite your claim that Apple has a super secret battery chemistry   
   that only kicks in on certain iOS updates & on certain iPhones (but not   
   iPads) & which requires Apple to admit guilt in criminal courts, and to pay   
   over a billion in civil courts to not admit guilt (particularly about the   
   backdating of release notes that they lied about before they got caught)...   
      
   You're _always_ defending everything Apple, to the death, no matter what.   
   Because of that, you not only can't have a normal conversation on Usenet...   
      
   But you _never_ attempt to add value in any post.   
   All you do is strive to _subtract_ value.   
      
   This isn't even about Apple and yet you try to protect Apple from itself.   
   Stop it.   
   --   
   Usenet is where friendly people daily gather to discuss topics of interest.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)