home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.tech      Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al      117,728 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 116,800 of 117,728   
   Andy Burnelli to Xeno   
   Re: Empiricism trumps Arlen's idiocy (wa   
   13 May 22 18:21:46   
   
   XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: spam@nospam.com   
      
   Xeno wrote:   
      
   > Indeed, I need to see a very overt issue before I would bother machining   
   > rotors. If you don't feel the symptoms on a road test, measurements look   
   > ok and the surfaces aren't gouged, I just fit pads, then do a bed in process   
      
   Hi Xeno,   
   On _that_ topic alone, have you ever seen a typical rotor "gouge" spec?   
   I have.   
      
   That spec is often hard to find, but when found, it's shocking (to me).   
   For two reasons.   
      
   The first is that the spec allows _huge_ gouges (imho).   
   And the second is I've never seen a rotor _that_ gouged.   
      
   No big deal. I'd junk any rotor that doesn't meet spec w/o a second thought   
   since a rotor is a safety item that costs only about $15 to $35 per wheel.   
      
   While I'm not saying gouges can't happen, I've _never_ failed a rotor on   
   its gouge spec in my life (however I only replace my own rotors of course).   
      
   My question to you are the two above:   
   a. Have you seen how (seemingly) huge a gouge has to be to fail spec?   
   b. How often have _you_ seen a rotor gouged enough to fail that spec?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca