Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.tech    |    Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al    |    117,728 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,800 of 117,728    |
|    Andy Burnelli to Xeno    |
|    Re: Empiricism trumps Arlen's idiocy (wa    |
|    13 May 22 18:21:46    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone       From: spam@nospam.com              Xeno wrote:              > Indeed, I need to see a very overt issue before I would bother machining       > rotors. If you don't feel the symptoms on a road test, measurements look       > ok and the surfaces aren't gouged, I just fit pads, then do a bed in process              Hi Xeno,       On _that_ topic alone, have you ever seen a typical rotor "gouge" spec?       I have.              That spec is often hard to find, but when found, it's shocking (to me).       For two reasons.              The first is that the spec allows _huge_ gouges (imho).       And the second is I've never seen a rotor _that_ gouged.              No big deal. I'd junk any rotor that doesn't meet spec w/o a second thought       since a rotor is a safety item that costs only about $15 to $35 per wheel.              While I'm not saying gouges can't happen, I've _never_ failed a rotor on       its gouge spec in my life (however I only replace my own rotors of course).              My question to you are the two above:       a. Have you seen how (seemingly) huge a gouge has to be to fail spec?       b. How often have _you_ seen a rotor gouged enough to fail that spec?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca