Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.tech    |    Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al    |    117,728 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,829 of 117,728    |
|    Xeno to Andy Burnelli    |
|    Re: Empiricism trumps Arlen's idiocy (wa    |
|    16 May 22 13:32:45    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone       From: xenolith@optusnet.com.au              On 16/5/2022 7:46 am, Andy Burnelli wrote:       > Andy Burnelli wrote:       >       >> If Amuzi is correct that warp (aka "thermal distortion") happens at a       >> lower       >> temperature than a thousand degrees for ten hours, then I'm all ears.       >>       >> Give me a fact, and I'll read it.       >> Does anyone have any reliable cites that back up their belief system?       >       > I realized belatedly that I didn't point out that the temperature it takes       > to "soften" rotors only has to be "locally" applied for what Amuzi is       > hypothesizing to occur, to occur.       >       > So, for example, you can perhaps get to the 2300 degrees it takes to begin       > softening rotors locally, but bear in mind rotors are _designed_ to cool       > off, so it's not going to be easily done, if it's even possible to be done.       >       > I get it that almost everyone trusts their intuition more than they will       > ever trust in facts, where I repeat I know Quantum Mechanics, where       > _nothing_ is intuitive. Trust me on that.              When people say *trust me*, it is far wiser to do the opposite.       >       > We humans own the intuition of monkeys.              You might, I don't. One of the things I do is *test* any *theory* I come       up with. Is the rotor warped? Intuition might tell you, my measurements       tell me what the reality is *on the ground*. I spent decades teaching       apprentices to *test* any diagnosis theories (or intuition) they come up       with. Never assume, just measure.              > That serves us well sometimes - but it serves us poorly most of the time.       >       > The reason it serves us poorly is that, sure, it "sounds good" that rotors       > would warp, especially when most of the time replacing or machining the       > rotors "solves" the warp, so, to most morons, it's intuitive it warped.              But to us *mechanics* who actually *measure the warp*, it is no longer       *intuitive*, it's *proven fact*. Facts are good.       >       > But the facts remain that you need an astoundingly huge temperature,       > whether applied locally or not, to force a rotor to deform like that.              Rotors never heat *uniformly*. In fact, it is the outer periphery that       will heat the most and it is the outer periphery that will begin to       deform first.       >       > The brake system can't handle that temperature.       >       > There are a few reasons for that, one of which is it never happens, but the       > more important reason is that the system is _designed_ to cool itself off.              Well done, and the cooling is *never even*.       >       > What I'm fighting here is the fact I'm not used to dealing with the hoi       > polloi who believe in a 20 second YouTube video of basically nothing,       > without even _reading_ the dozen or so reliable reference links I cited.              I don't consider myself to be a member of the hoi polloi and, in direct       contrast, I have seen and measured many such warped rotors as depicted       in the video. And, as in the video, I have *machined* countless rotors       *with warp* and measured, seen, heard and *felt* the same effects as       shown in that video and so many others.       >       > I'm not saying Amuzi is wrong, by the way - since his premise is valid that       > locally, the deformation temperature point might be reached in a typical       > braking system under duress...       > But what we need now is _science_ backing up his supposition.       > If you post it, I'll read it.       >       > More to the point, as with Vic Smith's reference, if I read it, I'll at       > least grasp what it says (using basic adult cognitive skills God gave me).              You screwed yourself on that last sentence.              --       Xeno                     Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.        (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca