XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: spam@nospam.com   
      
   Andy Burnelli wrote:   
      
   > sms wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Note relatively significant heat isolation of rotor braking surface as   
   >>> compared to caliper, brake lines, wheel bearing etc.   
   >>   
   >> Exactly. The idea that brake fluid would boil because the rotors got hot   
   >> displays a profound cluelessness about how vehicle braking systems function.   
   >   
   > It's kind of interesting how _desperate_ you have become given not a single   
   > one of you read even a single one of the references already provided.   
   >   
   > All you "can" do is point to a special Porsche destructive testing jig.   
   >   
   > You do realize that rotor was run on a special test jig that purposefully   
   > ran at a simulated speed of 150 mph continuously with the calipers locked.   
   >   
   > The pads were destroyed.   
   > The rubber was on fire.   
   > The fluid boiled.   
   > The rotors were cracked.   
   >   
   > Just as the references said they would be.   
   >   
   > Think about the _logic_ here, in your _desperation_ to back up your   
   > imaginary belief system.   
   >   
   > If you can't get rotors _that_ hot without _tremendous_ damage to the   
   > braking system components, how do people who claim their rotors warp   
   > "justify" that their pads and fluid and rubber is just fine.   
   >   
   > Doesn't anyone here own a synapse that can explain that obvious fatal flaw   
   > in their argument?   
      
   Yikes. I apologize to Amuzi!   
      
   I replied to this post "thinking" it was from Amuzi, who (along with Vic   
   Smith) was the only person to propose an hypothesis of _how_ we can   
   reconcile the fact that rotors at 2300 degrees would destroy braking   
   components such that anyone "claiming" their rotors warped would have to   
   rebuild the entire braking system if it indeed had happened.   
      
   I was actually replying to Steve (sms), by mistake... I apologize to Amuzi,   
   since Steve did _not_ supply any logical sensible explanation like Amuzi   
   did.   
      
   Bear in mind that I treat people as I perceive them, where Steve is a   
   hardened politician who is no stranger to sleazy political tricks.   
      
   I apologize to Amuzi, and I openly state I made a mistake when I _thought_   
   I was responding to him, when it was just Steve whom I was responding to.   
      
   Steve has _never_ done even a single brake job in his entire life,   
   but worse than that, Steve has already quoted four references which were   
   complete bullshit at the same time Steve didn't even _read_ the dozen cites   
   from the experts.   
      
   As when Steve promotes Verizon at all costs over T-Mobile (the car group   
   won't understand that but the rest of you certainly will), Steve always has   
   an agenda (as he does saying the government can brake any law they want to   
   if it's to protect _him_ from Covid)...   
      
   Bear in mind, I respect the experience of Xeno.   
   I respect the fact Vic Smith produced a scientific article.   
   I respect that Amuzi proposed an hypothesis of differential heating.   
      
   But I can't respect people like Alan Baker and Steve Scharf simply because   
   there is no possible way to reach a logic-based synapse in their brain.   
      
   I openly and publicly apologize to Amuzi!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)