Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.tech    |    Technical aspects of automobiles, et. al    |    117,728 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,623 of 117,728    |
|    Snag to Indira    |
|    Re: Jeep Compass octane    |
|    26 Apr 24 14:10:31    |
      From: Snag_one@msn.com              On 4/25/2024 11:00 PM, Indira wrote:       > Snag wrote:       >       >> You might see a slight decrease in gas mileage and power due to the       >> slightly retarded spark timing . Modern electronic controls will       >> optimize it all .       >       > Years ago I ran a test on a vehicle which stated it needed premium and I       > couldn't "measure" any difference whatsoever in gas mileage, even as I       > agree fully with your premise that there "should" be a "slight decrease" in       > gas mileage.       >       > I think the reason I couldn't measure it was that the measurement system we       > typically use isn't precise enough because the decrease is too slight. We       > measure by the typical method of what I refer to as "gallons used" tests.       > a. Fill the tank       > b. Drive normally until you need to fill the tank again (note the miles)       > c. Fill the tank again (note the number of gallons used & divide miles/gal)       >       > In my experience, this "gallons used" method isn't precise enough to       > measure the "slight decrease" you'd expect from lower octane rated fuel.               This method is accurate - if you go like 10 tanks the differences       average out . One tank at a time will give you a "close enough" mileage       number .       >       > When they really test gas mileage, they put a known WEIGHT of fuel in a       > plastic bag attached to the fuel lines, and run that and then weigh the       > fuel after a set number of miles. Our gallons-used test is less precise.       >       > Also, we don't normalize the type of driving, where in general, it's my       > understanding, that the only time the "wrong" gas should knock is in when       > the spark is advanced which doesn't happen all that often in normal       > driving.       >       > Sure, if you race everyone out of a stoplight, you'll be advanced, but most       > normal driving doesn't use spark advance all that much (although all are       > advanced - but I'm referring to extra degrees of spark advance situations).               Your understanding is outdated . Modern controls will optimize spark       advance and fuel mixture for the best possible combustion . Now my '86       GMC pickup with old fashioned distributor CAN be over-advanced and made       to ping . A note about that - the original distributor did have a       mechanism to retard spark if a knock was detected . But the block ,       heads , and connecting rods are about the only stock parts left .       --       Snag        "They may take our lives but       they'll never take our freedom."        William Wallace              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca